All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration bootup messages
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:48:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B01C8B5.7060903@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B01C803.1010303@sgi.com>

On 11/16/2009 01:45 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
> 
> 
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
>>
>>> --- linux.orig/init/calibrate.c
>>> +++ linux/init/calibrate.c
>>> @@ -123,23 +123,26 @@
>>>  {
>>>  	unsigned long ticks, loopbit;
>>>  	int lps_precision = LPS_PREC;
>>> +	bool boot_cpu = (smp_processor_id() == 0);
>>
>> this code is shared by other architectures too - are you sure 
>> smp_processor_id()==0 is a proper 'I am the boot CPU' assumption 
>> everywhere?
>>
>> 	Ingo
> 
> This was where having the boot_cpu_id would have been handy.
> 
> I could add something like:
> 
> --- linux.orig/init/main.c
> +++ linux/init/main.c
> @@ -539,13 +539,15 @@
>   *     Activate the first processor.
>   */
> 
> +int boot_cpu_id __read_mostly;
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +
>  static void __init boot_cpu_init(void)
>  {
> -       int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +       int boot_cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>         /* Mark the boot cpu "present", "online" etc for SMP and UP case */

Doesn't really work, does it?

I also still think that wrapping it in an inline would be good.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-16 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-16 21:07 [PATCH 0/6] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:34     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86: Limit the number of per cpu MCE " Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:35     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17  7:10       ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-17 17:16         ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 18:40         ` [PATCH] x86, mce: rework output of MCE banks ownership information Mike Travis
2009-12-14 21:46           ` Mike Travis
2009-12-15  1:50             ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:24   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:27     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:43       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-16 21:46         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:50           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17  3:09             ` David Miller
2009-11-17 15:59               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 16:29                 ` David Miller
2009-11-17 17:42                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 17:49                     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 17:54                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-17 17:59                       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 16:51               ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:45     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:48       ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-11-16 22:51         ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 22:55           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] firmware: Limit the number of per cpu firmware messages during bootup Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: Limit number of per cpu TSC sync messages Mike Travis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B01C8B5.7060903@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.