From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>
Cc: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ixgbe question
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:38:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0A9E4E.9010804@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0911231500060.24347@ask.diku.dk>
Jesper Dangaard Brouer a écrit :
> How is your smp_affinity mask's set?
>
> grep . /proc/irq/*/fiber1-*/../smp_affinity
First, I tried default affinities (ffff)
Then I tried irqbalance... no more success.
Driver seems to try to handle all queues on one cpu on low trafic,
and possibly dynamically switches to a multi-cpu mode,
but as all interrupts are masked, we stay in
a NAPI context handling all queues.
And we let one cpu in flood/drops mode.
>
>
>> But only one CPU (CPU1) had a softirq running, 100%, and many frames
>> were dropped
>
> Just a hint, I use 'ethtool -S fiber1' to see how the packets gets
> distributed across the rx and tx queues.
They are correctly distributed
rx_queue_0_packets: 14119644
rx_queue_0_bytes: 847178640
rx_queue_1_packets: 14126315
rx_queue_1_bytes: 847578900
rx_queue_2_packets: 14115249
rx_queue_2_bytes: 846914940
rx_queue_3_packets: 14118146
rx_queue_3_bytes: 847088760
rx_queue_4_packets: 14130869
rx_queue_4_bytes: 847853268
rx_queue_5_packets: 14112239
rx_queue_5_bytes: 846734340
rx_queue_6_packets: 14128425
rx_queue_6_bytes: 847705500
rx_queue_7_packets: 14110587
rx_queue_7_bytes: 846635220
rx_queue_8_packets: 14117350
rx_queue_8_bytes: 847041000
rx_queue_9_packets: 14125992
rx_queue_9_bytes: 847559520
rx_queue_10_packets: 14121732
rx_queue_10_bytes: 847303920
rx_queue_11_packets: 14120997
rx_queue_11_bytes: 847259820
rx_queue_12_packets: 14125576
rx_queue_12_bytes: 847535854
rx_queue_13_packets: 14118512
rx_queue_13_bytes: 847110720
rx_queue_14_packets: 14118348
rx_queue_14_bytes: 847100880
rx_queue_15_packets: 14118647
rx_queue_15_bytes: 847118820
>
>
>
>> CLONE_SKB="clone_skb 15"
>
> Be careful with to high clone, as my experience is it will send a burst
> of clone_skb packets before the packet gets randomized again.
Yes, but 15 should be ok with 10Gb link :)
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-23 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 6:46 [PATCH] irq: Add node_affinity CPU masks for smarter irqbalance hints Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-23 7:32 ` Yong Zhang
2009-11-23 7:32 ` Yong Zhang
2009-11-23 9:36 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-23 10:21 ` ixgbe question Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 10:30 ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-23 10:34 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2009-11-23 10:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 14:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 21:26 ` David Miller
2009-11-23 14:10 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-11-23 14:38 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-11-23 18:30 ` robert
2009-11-23 16:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-23 20:54 ` robert
2009-11-23 21:28 ` David Miller
2009-11-23 22:14 ` Robert Olsson
2009-11-23 23:28 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2009-11-23 23:44 ` David Miller
2009-11-24 7:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 8:46 ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-24 9:07 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 9:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 10:06 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 11:37 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] ixgbe: Fix TX stats accounting Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 13:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 7:38 ` Jeff Kirsher
2009-11-25 9:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 9:38 ` Jeff Kirsher
2009-11-24 13:14 ` ixgbe question John Fastabend
2009-11-29 8:18 ` David Miller
2009-11-30 13:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-30 20:20 ` John Fastabend
2009-11-26 14:10 ` Badalian Vyacheslav
2009-11-23 17:05 ` [PATCH] irq: Add node_affinity CPU masks for smarter irqbalance hints Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-23 23:32 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2009-11-24 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 8:59 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 9:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 9:15 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 14:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-24 9:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 10:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-24 17:55 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-25 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 6:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-24 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 14:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-24 17:39 ` David Miller
2009-11-24 17:56 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 18:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 18:33 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 19:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 19:53 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-11-24 18:54 ` David Miller
2009-11-24 18:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 20:35 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-24 20:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 10:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 10:37 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-25 11:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-25 11:50 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-26 11:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 5:17 ` Yong Zhang
2009-11-24 5:17 ` Yong Zhang
2009-11-24 8:39 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-10 21:27 Ixgbe question Ben Greear
2008-03-11 1:01 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0A9E4E.9010804@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hawk@diku.dk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.