From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-parisc <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s
Subject: [PATCHSET 0-5] remove unneeded nfsd #includes
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:58:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0C1EB7.50508@panasas.com> (raw)
Some arch files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*.
Some vfs files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*.
In an effort to move some of the now public nfsd headers to the source
directory, submitted a cleanup.
I have cross compiled sparc64 and s390, parsic needs testing. Please ARCH
people sends ACKs, or take these patches through your trees.
patches:
[PATCH 1/5] parsic: remove unused nfsd #includes
Some kind soul, please compile with this patch? compile
is all that's needed.
[PATCH 2/5] sparc: remove unused nfsd #includes
[PATCH 3/5] s390: remove unused nfsd #includes
These two were cross compiled. Should we submit them through
nfsd tree or the ARCH trees?
[PATCH 4/5] vfs: nfsctl.c unused nfsd #includes
[PATCH 5/5] lockd: Remove unused nfsd headers #includes
Can these patches go through the nfsd tree?
Who's ACKs should we collect? Andrew?
Bruce Hi
With this set applied, the only nfsd files used publicly are:
const.h export.h nfsfh.h stats.h syscall.h
These files can be moved to source folder:
cache.h debug.h nfsd.h state.h xdr3.h xdr4.h xdr.h
Why is debug.h exported from Kernel? (include/linux/nfsd/Kbuild)
So just to see how this move might look like see last patch:
[RFC] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory
This patch was compiled, as well, on x86(32/64), sparc64, s390
Thanks
Boaz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields"
<bfields-vtMw8L3fJ9vSiEDVxGk4TQ@public.gmane.org>,
Linux Kernel
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-parisc
<linux-parisc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-s
Subject: [PATCHSET 0-5] remove unneeded nfsd #includes
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:58:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0C1EB7.50508@panasas.com> (raw)
Some arch files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*.
Some vfs files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*.
In an effort to move some of the now public nfsd headers to the source
directory, submitted a cleanup.
I have cross compiled sparc64 and s390, parsic needs testing. Please ARCH
people sends ACKs, or take these patches through your trees.
patches:
[PATCH 1/5] parsic: remove unused nfsd #includes
Some kind soul, please compile with this patch? compile
is all that's needed.
[PATCH 2/5] sparc: remove unused nfsd #includes
[PATCH 3/5] s390: remove unused nfsd #includes
These two were cross compiled. Should we submit them through
nfsd tree or the ARCH trees?
[PATCH 4/5] vfs: nfsctl.c unused nfsd #includes
[PATCH 5/5] lockd: Remove unused nfsd headers #includes
Can these patches go through the nfsd tree?
Who's ACKs should we collect? Andrew?
Bruce Hi
With this set applied, the only nfsd files used publicly are:
const.h export.h nfsfh.h stats.h syscall.h
These files can be moved to source folder:
cache.h debug.h nfsd.h state.h xdr3.h xdr4.h xdr.h
Why is debug.h exported from Kernel? (include/linux/nfsd/Kbuild)
So just to see how this move might look like see last patch:
[RFC] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory
This patch was compiled, as well, on x86(32/64), sparc64, s390
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-parisc <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s
Subject: [PATCHSET 0-5] remove unneeded nfsd #includes
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:58:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0C1EB7.50508@panasas.com> (raw)
Some arch files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*.
Some vfs files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*.
In an effort to move some of the now public nfsd headers to the source
directory, submitted a cleanup.
I have cross compiled sparc64 and s390, parsic needs testing. Please ARCH
people sends ACKs, or take these patches through your trees.
patches:
[PATCH 1/5] parsic: remove unused nfsd #includes
Some kind soul, please compile with this patch? compile
is all that's needed.
[PATCH 2/5] sparc: remove unused nfsd #includes
[PATCH 3/5] s390: remove unused nfsd #includes
These two were cross compiled. Should we submit them through
nfsd tree or the ARCH trees?
[PATCH 4/5] vfs: nfsctl.c unused nfsd #includes
[PATCH 5/5] lockd: Remove unused nfsd headers #includes
Can these patches go through the nfsd tree?
Who's ACKs should we collect? Andrew?
Bruce Hi
With this set applied, the only nfsd files used publicly are:
const.h export.h nfsfh.h stats.h syscall.h
These files can be moved to source folder:
cache.h debug.h nfsd.h state.h xdr3.h xdr4.h xdr.h
Why is debug.h exported from Kernel? (include/linux/nfsd/Kbuild)
So just to see how this move might look like see last patch:
[RFC] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory
This patch was compiled, as well, on x86(32/64), sparc64, s390
Thanks
Boaz
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-parisc <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
pNFS Mailing List <pnfs@linux-nfs.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCHSET 0-5] remove unneeded nfsd #includes
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:58:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0C1EB7.50508@panasas.com> (raw)
Some arch files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*.
Some vfs files had unneeded #includes directives from linux/nfsd/*.
In an effort to move some of the now public nfsd headers to the source
directory, submitted a cleanup.
I have cross compiled sparc64 and s390, parsic needs testing. Please ARCH
people sends ACKs, or take these patches through your trees.
patches:
[PATCH 1/5] parsic: remove unused nfsd #includes
Some kind soul, please compile with this patch? compile
is all that's needed.
[PATCH 2/5] sparc: remove unused nfsd #includes
[PATCH 3/5] s390: remove unused nfsd #includes
These two were cross compiled. Should we submit them through
nfsd tree or the ARCH trees?
[PATCH 4/5] vfs: nfsctl.c unused nfsd #includes
[PATCH 5/5] lockd: Remove unused nfsd headers #includes
Can these patches go through the nfsd tree?
Who's ACKs should we collect? Andrew?
Bruce Hi
With this set applied, the only nfsd files used publicly are:
const.h export.h nfsfh.h stats.h syscall.h
These files can be moved to source folder:
cache.h debug.h nfsd.h state.h xdr3.h xdr4.h xdr.h
Why is debug.h exported from Kernel? (include/linux/nfsd/Kbuild)
So just to see how this move might look like see last patch:
[RFC] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory
This patch was compiled, as well, on x86(32/64), sparc64, s390
Thanks
Boaz
next reply other threads:[~2009-11-24 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-24 17:58 Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2009-11-24 17:58 ` [PATCHSET 0-5] remove unneeded nfsd #includes Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 17:58 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 17:58 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 17:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] parsic: remove unused " Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 17:59 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 17:59 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-26 14:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-26 14:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-26 14:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-26 14:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-26 21:47 ` Helge Deller
2009-11-26 21:47 ` Helge Deller
2009-11-24 17:59 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] sparc: " Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:01 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:01 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:01 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-25 23:19 ` David Miller
2009-11-25 23:19 ` David Miller
2009-11-24 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390: " Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:02 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:02 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-25 8:38 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-25 8:38 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-11-24 18:02 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] lockd: Remove unused nfsd headers #includes Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:03 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:03 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:03 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-25 20:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-25 20:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-25 20:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-25 20:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-25 20:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-25 20:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-26 12:39 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-26 12:39 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-03 17:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-03 17:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-12-03 17:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-24 18:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] vfs: nfsctl.c unused nfsd #includes Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:04 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:04 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:04 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-25 20:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-25 20:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-25 20:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-24 18:05 ` [RFC] nfsd: Move private headers to source directory Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:05 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:05 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-24 18:05 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-25 20:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-25 20:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-25 20:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-25 20:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-24 21:27 ` [PATCHSET 0-5] remove unneeded nfsd #includes Grant Grundler
2009-11-24 21:27 ` Grant Grundler
2009-11-24 21:27 ` Grant Grundler
2009-11-24 21:27 ` Grant Grundler
2009-11-24 23:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-24 23:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-25 8:42 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-11-25 8:42 ` Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0C1EB7.50508@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.