From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Anna Fischer <anna.fischer@hp.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Mark Smith <lk-netdev@lk-netdev.nosense.org>,
Gerhard Stenzel <gerhard.stenzel@de.ibm.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Jens Osterkamp <jens@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Patrick Mullaney <pmullaney@novell.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH 1/4] veth: move loopback logic to common location
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:14:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0EEFB1.3080403@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911261844.59912.arnd@arndb.de>
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 26 November 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> In addition to those already handled, I'd say
>>
>> - priority: affects qdisc classification, may refer to classes of the
>> old namespace
>> - ipvs_property: might cause packets to incorrectly skip netfilter hooks
>> - nf_trace: might trigger packet tracing
>> - nf_bridge: contains references to network devices in the old NS,
>> also indicates packet was bridged
>> - iif: index is only valid in the originating namespace
>> - probably secmark.
>
> ok
>
>> - tc_index: classification result, should only be set in the namespace
>> of the classifier
>> - tc_verd: RTTL etc. should begin at zero again
>
> Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of RTTL? If you create a loop
> across two devices in different namespaces, it may no longer get
> detected. Or is that a different problem again?
Mhh good point, that would indeed be possible. OTOH using ingress
filtering in one namespace currently might cause the packet to get
dropped in a different namespace because the ttl runs out. For now
I'd suggest to go the safe route and keep the TTL intact until we
can come up with something better.
> +void skb_set_dev(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + if (skb->dev && !net_eq(dev_net(skb->dev), dev_net(dev))) {
> + secpath_reset(skb);
> + skb_dst_drop(skb);
> + nf_reset(skb);
> + skb_init_secmark(skb);
> + skb->mark = 0;
> + skb->priority = 0;
> + skb->nf_trace = 0;
> + skb->ipvs_property = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SCHED
> + skb->tc_index = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> + skb->tc_verd = SET_TC_VERD(skb->tc_verd, 0);
> + skb->tc_verd = SET_TC_RTTL(skb->tc_verd, 0);
> +#endif
> +#endif
This makes we wonder which ones we actually should keep. Most of the
others get reinitialized anyways, so maybe its better to simply clear
the entire area up until ->tail like f.i. skb_recycle_check().
> + }
> + skb->dev = dev;
> + skb->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
This doesn't seem necessary, if the packet goes through
netif_receive_skb, it will be set anyways.
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_set_dev);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Anna Fischer <anna.fischer@hp.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Smith <lk-netdev@lk-netdev.nosense.org>,
Gerhard Stenzel <gerhard.stenzel@de.ibm.com>,
Jens Osterkamp <jens@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Patrick Mullaney <pmullaney@novell.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] veth: move loopback logic to common location
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:14:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0EEFB1.3080403@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911261844.59912.arnd@arndb.de>
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 26 November 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> In addition to those already handled, I'd say
>>
>> - priority: affects qdisc classification, may refer to classes of the
>> old namespace
>> - ipvs_property: might cause packets to incorrectly skip netfilter hooks
>> - nf_trace: might trigger packet tracing
>> - nf_bridge: contains references to network devices in the old NS,
>> also indicates packet was bridged
>> - iif: index is only valid in the originating namespace
>> - probably secmark.
>
> ok
>
>> - tc_index: classification result, should only be set in the namespace
>> of the classifier
>> - tc_verd: RTTL etc. should begin at zero again
>
> Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of RTTL? If you create a loop
> across two devices in different namespaces, it may no longer get
> detected. Or is that a different problem again?
Mhh good point, that would indeed be possible. OTOH using ingress
filtering in one namespace currently might cause the packet to get
dropped in a different namespace because the ttl runs out. For now
I'd suggest to go the safe route and keep the TTL intact until we
can come up with something better.
> +void skb_set_dev(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + if (skb->dev && !net_eq(dev_net(skb->dev), dev_net(dev))) {
> + secpath_reset(skb);
> + skb_dst_drop(skb);
> + nf_reset(skb);
> + skb_init_secmark(skb);
> + skb->mark = 0;
> + skb->priority = 0;
> + skb->nf_trace = 0;
> + skb->ipvs_property = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SCHED
> + skb->tc_index = 0;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> + skb->tc_verd = SET_TC_VERD(skb->tc_verd, 0);
> + skb->tc_verd = SET_TC_RTTL(skb->tc_verd, 0);
> +#endif
> +#endif
This makes we wonder which ones we actually should keep. Most of the
others get reinitialized anyways, so maybe its better to simply clear
the entire area up until ->tail like f.i. skb_recycle_check().
> + }
> + skb->dev = dev;
> + skb->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
This doesn't seem necessary, if the packet goes through
netif_receive_skb, it will be set anyways.
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_set_dev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-26 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-24 0:56 [Bridge] [PATCHv2 0/4] macvlan: add vepa and bridge mode Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 0:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 0:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] veth: move loopback logic to common location Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 0:56 ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 0:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 9:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 9:51 ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 9:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 10:02 ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 10:17 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 10:17 ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 10:17 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 10:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 10:34 ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 10:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 10:40 ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 10:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 13:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 13:13 ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 13:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 16:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-24 16:42 ` [Bridge] " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-24 16:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-24 16:56 ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 16:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 18:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-24 18:10 ` [Bridge] " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-24 18:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-24 18:28 ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 18:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 18:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 18:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 18:38 ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 18:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-26 15:21 ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-26 15:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-26 15:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-26 15:33 ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2009-11-26 15:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-26 16:38 ` [Bridge] " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-26 16:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-26 16:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-26 17:44 ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-26 17:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-26 21:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-26 21:14 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-11-26 21:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-26 17:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-26 15:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 16:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 10:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 0:56 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 2/4] macvlan: cleanup rx statistics Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 0:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 8:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 8:15 ` [Bridge] " Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 8:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-24 8:45 ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 8:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 9:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 9:28 ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 9:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 8:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 10:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 10:41 ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 10:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 0:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 0:56 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 3/4] macvlan: implement bridge, VEPA and private mode Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 0:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 0:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 0:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 10:42 ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 10:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 12:45 ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 12:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 12:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 10:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 0:56 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 4/4] macvlan: export macvlan mode through netlink Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 0:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 10:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 10:53 ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 10:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 12:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 12:57 ` [Bridge] " Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 12:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-24 13:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 13:47 ` [Bridge] " Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 13:47 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-24 0:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0EEFB1.3080403@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=anna.fischer@hp.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gerhard.stenzel@de.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jens@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lk-netdev@lk-netdev.nosense.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmullaney@novell.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.