All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Vedran Furač" <vedran.furac@gmail.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom_kill: use rss value instead of vm size for badness
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:56:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0F31DB.6020009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091126103234.806a4982.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:10:12 +0100
> Vedran Furač <vedran.furac@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>>
>>> lengthy discussion on something I think is quite obviously better and
>>> I tried to change a couple of years back already (rss instead of
>>> total_vm).
>> Now that 2.6.32 is almost out, is it possible to get OOMK fixed in
>> 2.6.33 so that I could turn overcommit on (overcommit_memory=0) again
>> without fear of loosing my work?
>>
> I'll try fork-bomb detector again. That will finally help your X.org.
> But It may lose 2.6.33.
> 
> Adding new counter to mm_struct is now rejected because of scalability, so
> total work will need more time (than expected).
> I'm sorry I can't get enough time in these weeks.

Thanks for working on this! Hope it gets into 33. Keep me posted.

Regards,

Vedran


-- 
http://vedranf.net | a8e7a7783ca0d460fee090cc584adc12

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Vedran Furač" <vedran.furac@gmail.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom_kill: use rss value instead of vm size for badness
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:56:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0F31DB.6020009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091126103234.806a4982.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:10:12 +0100
> Vedran FuraA? <vedran.furac@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>>
>>> lengthy discussion on something I think is quite obviously better and
>>> I tried to change a couple of years back already (rss instead of
>>> total_vm).
>> Now that 2.6.32 is almost out, is it possible to get OOMK fixed in
>> 2.6.33 so that I could turn overcommit on (overcommit_memory=0) again
>> without fear of loosing my work?
>>
> I'll try fork-bomb detector again. That will finally help your X.org.
> But It may lose 2.6.33.
> 
> Adding new counter to mm_struct is now rejected because of scalability, so
> total work will need more time (than expected).
> I'm sorry I can't get enough time in these weeks.

Thanks for working on this! Hope it gets into 33. Keep me posted.

Regards,

Vedran


-- 
http://vedranf.net | a8e7a7783ca0d460fee090cc584adc12

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-27  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-28  8:58 [PATCH] oom_kill: use rss value instead of vm size for badness KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-28  8:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-28  9:15 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28  9:15   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 11:04   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-28 11:04     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-29  1:00     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-29  1:00       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-29  2:31       ` Minchan Kim
2009-10-29  2:31         ` Minchan Kim
2009-10-29  8:31       ` David Rientjes
2009-10-29  8:31         ` David Rientjes
2009-10-29  8:46         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-29  8:46           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-29  9:01           ` David Rientjes
2009-10-29  9:01             ` David Rientjes
2009-10-29  9:16             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-29  9:16               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-29  9:44               ` David Rientjes
2009-10-29  9:44                 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-29 23:41                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-10-29 23:41                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-01 13:29         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-01 13:29           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-02 10:42           ` David Rientjes
2009-11-02 10:42             ` David Rientjes
2009-11-02 12:35             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-02 12:35               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-02 19:55               ` Vedran Furač
2009-11-02 19:55                 ` Vedran Furač
2009-11-03 23:09                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-03 23:09                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-07 19:16                   ` Vedran Furač
2009-11-07 19:16                     ` Vedran Furač
2009-11-25 12:44         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-11-25 12:44           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-11-25 21:39           ` David Rientjes
2009-11-25 21:39             ` David Rientjes
2009-11-27 18:26             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-11-27 18:26               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-11-30 23:09               ` David Rientjes
2009-11-30 23:09                 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-01  4:43                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-01  4:43                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-01 22:20                   ` David Rientjes
2009-12-01 22:20                     ` David Rientjes
2009-12-02  0:35                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-02  0:35                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-03 23:25                       ` David Rientjes
2009-12-03 23:25                         ` David Rientjes
2009-12-04  0:44                         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-12-04  0:44                           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-26  0:10           ` Vedran Furač
2009-11-26  0:10             ` Vedran Furač
2009-11-26  1:32             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-26  1:32               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-27  1:56               ` Vedran Furač [this message]
2009-11-27  1:56                 ` Vedran Furač

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B0F31DB.6020009@gmail.com \
    --to=vedran.furac@gmail.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.