From: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
To: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2] acpi: don't cond_resched if irq is disabled
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:21:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B20E7B2.1010208@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260446205-16868-1-git-send-email-dfeng@redhat.com>
Hi Xiaotian,
I think, this is another round of "armor vs. bullet" race... It will hold until
might_sleep() logic changes again.
Please consider using preemptible() -- IMHO this is the check we should perform
in our case of voluntary preemption.
Regards,
Alex.
Xiaotian Feng пишет:
> commit 8bd108d adds preemption point after each opcode parse, then
> a sleeping function called from invalid context bug was founded
> during suspend/resume stage. this was fixed in commit abe1dfa by
> don't cond_resched when irq_disabled. But recent commit 138d156 changes
> the behaviour to don't cond_resched when in_atomic. This makes the
> sleeping function called from invalid context bug happen again, which
> is reported in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/1/371.
>
> This patch also fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14483
>
> Reported-and-bisected-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> Reported-and-bisected-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
> Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> ---
> include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> index 9d7febd..0946997 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static inline void *acpi_os_acquire_object(acpi_cache_t * cache)
> #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> #define ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() \
> do { \
> - if (!in_atomic_preempt_off()) \
> + if (!in_atomic_preempt_off() && !irqs_disabled()) \
> cond_resched(); \
> } while (0)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
To: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2] acpi: don't cond_resched if irq is disabled
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:21:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B20E7B2.1010208@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260446205-16868-1-git-send-email-dfeng@redhat.com>
Hi Xiaotian,
I think, this is another round of "armor vs. bullet" race... It will hold until
might_sleep() logic changes again.
Please consider using preemptible() -- IMHO this is the check we should perform
in our case of voluntary preemption.
Regards,
Alex.
Xiaotian Feng пишет:
> commit 8bd108d adds preemption point after each opcode parse, then
> a sleeping function called from invalid context bug was founded
> during suspend/resume stage. this was fixed in commit abe1dfa by
> don't cond_resched when irq_disabled. But recent commit 138d156 changes
> the behaviour to don't cond_resched when in_atomic. This makes the
> sleeping function called from invalid context bug happen again, which
> is reported in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/1/371.
>
> This patch also fixes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14483
>
> Reported-and-bisected-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> Reported-and-bisected-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
> Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
> Cc: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> ---
> include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> index 9d7febd..0946997 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static inline void *acpi_os_acquire_object(acpi_cache_t * cache)
> #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> #define ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() \
> do { \
> - if (!in_atomic_preempt_off()) \
> + if (!in_atomic_preempt_off() && !irqs_disabled()) \
> cond_resched(); \
> } while (0)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-10 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-04 4:26 [PATCH] ACPICA: don't cond_resched() when irq_disabled or in_atomic Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-04 5:36 ` Zhang Rui
2009-12-04 5:38 ` Zhang Rui
2009-12-04 6:50 ` Justin Mattock
2009-12-04 6:50 ` Justin Mattock
2009-12-04 7:05 ` Danny Feng
2009-12-04 7:27 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-12-09 1:54 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-10 10:09 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-10 11:56 ` [PATCH -V2] acpi: don't cond_resched if irq is disabled Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-10 12:21 ` Alexey Starikovskiy [this message]
2009-12-10 12:21 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-11 5:46 ` Lin Ming
2009-12-11 5:46 ` Lin Ming
2009-12-11 11:48 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-11 11:48 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-11 16:15 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-11 16:25 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-11 16:25 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-11 17:34 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-28 6:02 ` Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-28 11:12 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-28 11:12 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2010-01-16 6:44 ` Len Brown
2009-12-10 17:58 ` [PATCH] ACPICA: don't cond_resched() when irq_disabled or in_atomic Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-10 17:58 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-10 18:18 ` Pavel Machek
2009-12-10 18:37 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-10 18:37 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2009-12-10 22:46 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-12-10 22:46 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-12-10 22:54 ` Moore, Robert
2009-12-10 22:54 ` Moore, Robert
2010-01-16 6:46 ` Len Brown
2009-12-11 17:33 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B20E7B2.1010208@suse.de \
--to=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
--cc=dfeng@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.