All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	open-osd <osd-dev@open-osd.org>,
	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Stable Tree <stable@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH] scsi_lib: Bug in completion of bidi commands
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:53:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B3C586F.8020200@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B27AA77.3040002@panasas.com>

On 12/15/2009 05:25 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> 
> Because of the terrible structuring of scsi-bidi-commands
> it breaks some of the life time rules of a scsi-command.
> It is now not allowed to free up the block-request before
> cleanup and partial deallocation of the scsi-command. (Which
> is not so for none bidi commands)
> 
> The right fix to this problem would be to make bidi command
> a first citizen by allocating a scsi_sdb pointer at scsi command
> just like cmd->prot_sdb. The bidi sdb should be allocated/deallocated
> as part of the get/put_command (Again like the prot_sdb) and the
> current decoupling of scsi_cmnd and blk-request should be kept.
> 
> For now make sure scsi_release_buffers() is called before the
> call to blk_end_request_all() which might cause the suicide of
> the block requests. At best the leak of bidi buffers, at worse
> a crash, as there is a race between the existence of the bidi_request
> and the free of the associated bidi_sdb.
> 
> The reason this was never hit before is because only OSD has the potential
> of doing asynchronous bidi commands. (So does bsg but it is never used)
> And OSD clients just happen to do all their bidi commands synchronously, up
> until recently.
> 
> CC: Stable Tree <stable@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>

James hi.

What about this BUG. It affects anybody doing bidi commands. The possibilities
are an sglist leak at best, and a crash at worse.

I understand this code needs cleanup, but first things first. Lets first fix the
bug, which should also go to stable. Then the cleanup can go to next merge window.

BTW: Should I attempt a cleanup on current code, or should I wait for Alan's Patch
to go in first?

Thanks
Boaz

> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index 5987da8..bc9a881 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -749,9 +749,9 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, unsigned int good_bytes)
>  			 */
>  			req->next_rq->resid_len = scsi_in(cmd)->resid;
>  
> +			scsi_release_buffers(cmd);
>  			blk_end_request_all(req, 0);
>  
> -			scsi_release_buffers(cmd);
>  			scsi_next_command(cmd);
>  			return;
>  		}


  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-31  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-15 15:25 [PATCH] scsi_lib: Bug in completion of bidi commands Boaz Harrosh
2009-12-31  7:53 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2010-01-01  2:46   ` [osd-dev] " Alan Stern
2010-01-03 10:11     ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-01-03 16:55       ` Alan Stern
2010-01-04  7:26         ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-01-12 11:16 ` Boaz Harrosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B3C586F.8020200@panasas.com \
    --to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.