All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <danborkmann@googlemail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mpm@selenic.com, danborkmann@googlemail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmoyer@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll: allow execution of multiple rx_hooks per interface
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:06:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4630C0.6090206@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100107.010201.51693251.davem@davemloft.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 897 bytes --]

David Miller wrote:
> From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:54:05 -0600
> 
>> Please inline patches so they can be reviewed easily in reply.
>>
>>
>> -       struct netpoll *np = npi->rx_np;
>> +       struct netpoll **np = &npi->rx_np;
>>  
>> -       if (!np)
>> +       if (!(*np))
>>
>> This makes everything horrible. Can you avoid the double indirection?
>> Using a list head might be a good answer.
>>
> 
> Agreed on all counts.
> 

Agreed on the double indirection, I'll fix it.

I've already considered the list_head structure, but then I was the opinion
that a double linked list might not be necessary for this, so I did it that
way ... (compare: kernel notifier by Alan Cox). If you insist on that I'll
fix it of course ;)

Best regards,
Daniel

P.s.: Sorry Matt for not CCing. I mainly took those addresses from Jeffs post.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 261 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-07 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-06 20:54 [PATCH] netpoll: allow execution of multiple rx_hooks per interface Daniel Borkmann
2010-01-07  3:54 ` Matt Mackall
2010-01-07  9:02   ` David Miller
2010-01-07 19:06     ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2010-01-08  0:20       ` Daniel Borkmann
2010-01-11 23:21         ` Matt Mackall
2010-01-11 23:59           ` David Miller
2010-01-12  0:03             ` Matt Mackall
2010-01-12  0:09               ` Daniel Borkmann
2010-01-13  0:27                 ` Daniel Borkmann
2010-01-13 13:57                   ` Jeff Moyer
2010-01-13 16:53                     ` Daniel Borkmann
2010-01-13 16:53                       ` Daniel Borkmann
2010-01-14  4:41                   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B4630C0.6090206@gmail.com \
    --to=danborkmann@googlemail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.