From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kvm-ppc <kvm-ppc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: PPC: Pass through program interrupts
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:37:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B49CA20.6000303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F51B03C-D36B-49F9-9AF3-EF5227DFAE3F-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
On 01/10/2010 02:32 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
>> Applied both, and queued for .33. I was able to guess this from the description, but please mention it explicitly in the future.
>>
> I'm not sure what to mention. From a stability point of view, all the Book3S patches should go in .33 because they all fix severe bugs.
>
> But then again the question is what our goal for .33 is. If we only want to give out the message "KVM for Book3S is coming! Stay tuned!" then we shouldn't do any updates for .33. If we want to have something working to the best of our knowledge, all patches should go into .33.
>
Given the other 9-patch series, I'll regard .33 as a sneak preview (look
but don't touch) and .34 will be the first really serious kvm ppc64 release.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kvm-ppc <kvm-ppc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: PPC: Pass through program interrupts
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:37:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B49CA20.6000303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F51B03C-D36B-49F9-9AF3-EF5227DFAE3F-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
On 01/10/2010 02:32 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
>> Applied both, and queued for .33. I was able to guess this from the description, but please mention it explicitly in the future.
>>
> I'm not sure what to mention. From a stability point of view, all the Book3S patches should go in .33 because they all fix severe bugs.
>
> But then again the question is what our goal for .33 is. If we only want to give out the message "KVM for Book3S is coming! Stay tuned!" then we shouldn't do any updates for .33. If we want to have something working to the best of our knowledge, all patches should go into .33.
>
Given the other 9-patch series, I'll regard .33 as a sneak preview (look
but don't touch) and .34 will be the first really serious kvm ppc64 release.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-10 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-10 2:27 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: PPC: Pass through program interrupts Alexander Graf
2010-01-10 2:27 ` Alexander Graf
2010-01-10 12:22 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-10 12:22 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <4B49C684.8080407-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-10 12:32 ` Alexander Graf
2010-01-10 12:32 ` Alexander Graf
[not found] ` <3F51B03C-D36B-49F9-9AF3-EF5227DFAE3F-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-10 12:37 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-01-10 12:37 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <4B49CA20.6000303-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-10 12:46 ` Alexander Graf
2010-01-10 12:46 ` Alexander Graf
2010-01-10 14:26 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-10 14:26 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <4B49E391.60108-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-10 15:06 ` Alexander Graf
2010-01-10 15:06 ` Alexander Graf
[not found] ` <A5862364-1443-4A32-85B8-13B11B2E55DA-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-10 15:09 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-10 15:09 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <4B49EDBA.9040306-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-10 15:28 ` Alexander Graf
2010-01-10 15:28 ` Alexander Graf
[not found] ` <A21E3A8F-81D1-468A-BE37-9CB5718E1FB8-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-10 15:37 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-10 15:37 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-10 15:54 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-10 15:54 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B49CA20.6000303@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kvm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.