Re: New kvm-related qemu patch queue

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 01/10/2010 04:49 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
>> If the feature is already in both, then morph qemu-kvm.git into what
>> is already in qemu.git.  Hopefully anything missing in qemu.git will
>> be discovered while making the changes.
>>
>>      
> What about bugs that are present only in qemu.git? Like this:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/42298/. Should it go through
> qemu-kvm.git/uq/master?
>    

Yes.  So there is a central place for kvm patches, and so they see autotest.


> What about this one: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/42447/ should it
> be postponed untill qemu.git and qemu-kvm.git converge on using the same
> cpuid infrastructure, or add similar functionality to qemu-kvm to,
> or add new cpu flags to qemu-kvm only and when cpuid code converge
> qemu.git will have it too?
>    

Best to make qemu-kvm.git and qemu.git converge first.  Duplicating the 
patch extends the problem.  Of course if something is urgent we can 
bypass the process.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function