All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francesco VIRLINZI <francesco.virlinzi@st.com>
To: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 1/7 v2] Add a common struct clk
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:48:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4C376C.6080705@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263279511.160551.332624337260.1.gpush@pororo>

Hi Jeremy
In November I already sent a proposal on
  a generic linux clk framework.
On that I would suggest:

>
> +struct clk {
> +	const struct clk_operations *ops;
>    
            spinlock_t lock;
            const char *name;
            int id;
            unsigned long rate;
> +};
> +
> +struct clk_operations {
>    
                int (*init)(struc clk *);
> +       int             (*enable)(struct clk *);
> +       void            (*disable)(struct clk *);
> +       unsigned long   (*get_rate)(struct clk *);
> +       void            (*put)(struct clk *);
> +       long            (*round_rate)(struct clk *, unsigned long);
> +       int             (*set_rate)(struct clk *, unsigned long);
> +       int             (*set_parent)(struct clk *, struct clk *);
> +       struct clk*     (*get_parent)(struct clk *);
> +};
>    

+static inline int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
+{
	unsigned long flags;
	int ret = 0;
+	if (clk->ops->enable) {
		spinlock_irq_save(&clk->lock, flags);
+		ret = clk->ops->enable(clk);
		spinlock_irq_restore(&clk->lock, flags);
	}
+	return 0;
+}

Something similar in the other function...

> +
> +static inline unsigned long clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> +	if (clk->ops->get_rate)
> +		return clk->ops->get_rate(clk);
>    
> 	return clk->rate;
> +}
>
>    
Moreover if you support .set_parent and .get_parent  a .parent field in 
the struct clk
  is useful.

As

struct clk {
const struct clk_operations *ops;

     spinlock_t lock;
     const char *name;
     int id;
     unsigned long rate;
     struct clk *parent;
};

Regards
  Francesco

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: francesco.virlinzi@st.com (Francesco VIRLINZI)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC,PATCH 1/7 v2] Add a common struct clk
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:48:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4C376C.6080705@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263279511.160551.332624337260.1.gpush@pororo>

Hi Jeremy
In November I already sent a proposal on
  a generic linux clk framework.
On that I would suggest:

>
> +struct clk {
> +	const struct clk_operations *ops;
>    
            spinlock_t lock;
            const char *name;
            int id;
            unsigned long rate;
> +};
> +
> +struct clk_operations {
>    
                int (*init)(struc clk *);
> +       int             (*enable)(struct clk *);
> +       void            (*disable)(struct clk *);
> +       unsigned long   (*get_rate)(struct clk *);
> +       void            (*put)(struct clk *);
> +       long            (*round_rate)(struct clk *, unsigned long);
> +       int             (*set_rate)(struct clk *, unsigned long);
> +       int             (*set_parent)(struct clk *, struct clk *);
> +       struct clk*     (*get_parent)(struct clk *);
> +};
>    

+static inline int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
+{
	unsigned long flags;
	int ret = 0;
+	if (clk->ops->enable) {
		spinlock_irq_save(&clk->lock, flags);
+		ret = clk->ops->enable(clk);
		spinlock_irq_restore(&clk->lock, flags);
	}
+	return 0;
+}

Something similar in the other function...

> +
> +static inline unsigned long clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> +	if (clk->ops->get_rate)
> +		return clk->ops->get_rate(clk);
>    
> 	return clk->rate;
> +}
>
>    
Moreover if you support .set_parent and .get_parent  a .parent field in 
the struct clk
  is useful.

As

struct clk {
const struct clk_operations *ops;

     spinlock_t lock;
     const char *name;
     int id;
     unsigned long rate;
     struct clk *parent;
};

Regards
  Francesco

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Francesco VIRLINZI <francesco.virlinzi@st.com>
To: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 1/7 v2] Add a common struct clk
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:48:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4C376C.6080705@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263279511.160551.332624337260.1.gpush@pororo>

Hi Jeremy
In November I already sent a proposal on
  a generic linux clk framework.
On that I would suggest:

>
> +struct clk {
> +	const struct clk_operations *ops;
>    
            spinlock_t lock;
            const char *name;
            int id;
            unsigned long rate;
> +};
> +
> +struct clk_operations {
>    
                int (*init)(struc clk *);
> +       int             (*enable)(struct clk *);
> +       void            (*disable)(struct clk *);
> +       unsigned long   (*get_rate)(struct clk *);
> +       void            (*put)(struct clk *);
> +       long            (*round_rate)(struct clk *, unsigned long);
> +       int             (*set_rate)(struct clk *, unsigned long);
> +       int             (*set_parent)(struct clk *, struct clk *);
> +       struct clk*     (*get_parent)(struct clk *);
> +};
>    

+static inline int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
+{
	unsigned long flags;
	int ret = 0;
+	if (clk->ops->enable) {
		spinlock_irq_save(&clk->lock, flags);
+		ret = clk->ops->enable(clk);
		spinlock_irq_restore(&clk->lock, flags);
	}
+	return 0;
+}

Something similar in the other function...

> +
> +static inline unsigned long clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> +	if (clk->ops->get_rate)
> +		return clk->ops->get_rate(clk);
>    
> 	return clk->rate;
> +}
>
>    
Moreover if you support .set_parent and .get_parent  a .parent field in 
the struct clk
  is useful.

As

struct clk {
const struct clk_operations *ops;

     spinlock_t lock;
     const char *name;
     int id;
     unsigned long rate;
     struct clk *parent;
};

Regards
  Francesco

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-12  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-12  6:58 [RFC,PATCH 0/7 v2] Common struct clk implementation Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58 ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58 ` [RFC, PATCH 6/7 v2] arm/icst307: use common struct clk, unify realview and versatile clocks Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58   ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58 ` [RFC,PATCH 4/7 v2] arm/versatile: remove oscoff from clk_versatile Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58   ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58 ` [RFC,PATCH 7/7 v2] arm/icst307: remove icst307_ps_to_vco Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58   ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58 ` [RFC,PATCH 5/7 v2] arm/realview: use generic struct clk Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58   ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58 ` [RFC,PATCH 1/7 v2] Add a common " Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58   ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  8:48   ` Francesco VIRLINZI [this message]
2010-01-12  8:48     ` Francesco VIRLINZI
2010-01-12  8:48     ` Francesco VIRLINZI
2010-01-12  9:01     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-12  9:01       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-12 14:24       ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-12 14:24         ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-12 14:27       ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-12 14:27         ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-12 14:30   ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-12 14:30     ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-12 14:30     ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-12  6:58 ` [RFC,PATCH 3/7 v2] arm/versatile: use generic " Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58   ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12 16:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-12 16:25     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-12 16:25     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-25  0:35     ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-25  0:35       ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-25  0:35       ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58 ` [RFC,PATCH 2/7 v2] Generic support for fixed-rate clocks Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  6:58   ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-12  9:13 ` [RFC,PATCH 0/7 v2] Common struct clk implementation Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-12  9:13   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-12  9:13   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-01-13  1:17   ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-13  1:17     ` Jeremy Kerr
2010-01-13  1:17     ` Jeremy Kerr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B4C376C.6080705@st.com \
    --to=francesco.virlinzi@st.com \
    --cc=jeremy.kerr@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.