All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"ananth@in.ibm.com" <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 5/5] x86: use dmi check to treat disabled cpus as hotplug cpus.
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:13:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4D2C44.2060709@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263348363.2854.1360.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>

On 01/12/2010 06:06 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 17:55 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> you mean this blacklist could be too long?
> 
> yes.
> 
>>
>> switch to whitelist for the box can treat disabled cpus as hotplug
>> cpus?
> 
> Do we really need all this? Systems which support physical hotplug
> typically have lot's of cpu's (mostly will have atleast > 8). Even if we
> really need to identify, then perhaps we can check if ACPI has any hints
> regarding the physical hotplug support at boot time (we should check
> with Andi Kleen or Len Brown on this).
> 
> For now, I think we can keep it simple by using the detected enabled
> cpu's.

sth like this ?

---
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1190,7 +1190,6 @@ early_param("possible_cpus", _setup_poss
  * - Ashok Raj
  *
  * Three ways to find out the number of additional hotplug CPUs:
- * - If the BIOS specified disabled CPUs in ACPI/mptables use that.
  * - The user can overwrite it with possible_cpus=NUM
  * - Otherwise don't reserve additional CPUs.
  * We do this because additional CPUs waste a lot of memory.
@@ -1205,7 +1204,7 @@ __init void prefill_possible_map(void)
 		num_processors = 1;
 
 	if (setup_possible_cpus == -1)
-		possible = num_processors + disabled_cpus;
+		possible = num_processors;
 	else
 		possible = setup_possible_cpus;
 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-13  2:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-12 23:17 [PATCH 0/5] clean up logical flat apic mode using Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH -v2 1/5] use nr_cpus= to set nr_cpu_ids early Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: using logical flat for amd cpu too Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH -v2 3/5] x86: according to nr_cpu_ids to decide if need to leave logical flat Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH -v2 5/5] x86: use dmi check to treat disabled cpus as hotplug cpus Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:56   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13  0:05     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13  1:48       ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13  1:55         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13  2:06           ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13  2:13             ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-01-13  2:21               ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13  2:26                 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 21:46       ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-13 22:00         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 22:23           ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-13 22:27             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 22:29               ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 22:36                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 22:49                   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 23:02                     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 23:13                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 23:52                         ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-14  9:25                     ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: make 32bit apic flat to physflat switch like 64bit Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B4D2C44.2060709@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.