All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>
To: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	ego@in.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: implement arch_scale_smt_power for Power7
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:09:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B577F1A.9060907@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26556.1264021443@neuling.org>


>> +	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTRS_POWER7) && weight == 4) {
>>     
>
> I think we should avoid using cpu_has_feature like this.  It's better to
> create a new feature and add it to POWER7 in the cputable, then check
> for that here.
>
> The way that it is now, I think any CPU that has superset of the POWER7
> features, will be true here.  This is not what we want.
>   
Any ideas for what to call this feature?  ASYM_SMT4 ?
>
>> +	smt_gain /= weight;
>>     
>
> This results in a PPC div, when most of the time it's going to be a
> power of two divide.  You've optimised the divides a few lines above
> this, but not this one.  Some consistency would be good.
>
>   
I can turn that into a conditional branch (case statement) with a shift 
for the common 1,2,4 cases which should cover all procs available today 
falling back to a divide for any theoretical future processors that do 
other numbers of threads.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>
To: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ego@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: implement arch_scale_smt_power for Power7
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:09:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B577F1A.9060907@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26556.1264021443@neuling.org>


>> +	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTRS_POWER7) && weight == 4) {
>>     
>
> I think we should avoid using cpu_has_feature like this.  It's better to
> create a new feature and add it to POWER7 in the cputable, then check
> for that here.
>
> The way that it is now, I think any CPU that has superset of the POWER7
> features, will be true here.  This is not what we want.
>   
Any ideas for what to call this feature?  ASYM_SMT4 ?
>
>> +	smt_gain /= weight;
>>     
>
> This results in a PPC div, when most of the time it's going to be a
> power of two divide.  You've optimised the divides a few lines above
> this, but not this one.  Some consistency would be good.
>
>   
I can turn that into a conditional branch (case statement) with a shift 
for the common 1,2,4 cases which should cover all procs available today 
falling back to a divide for any theoretical future processors that do 
other numbers of threads.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-20 22:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-20 20:00 [PATCH 0/2] sched: arch_scale_smt_powers Joel Schopp
2010-01-20 20:00 ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-20 20:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: Fix the place where group powers are updated Joel Schopp
2010-01-20 20:02   ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-21 13:54   ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Gautham R Shenoy
2010-01-26 23:28   ` [PATCHv2 1/2] sched: enable ARCH_POWER Joel Schopp
2010-01-26 23:28     ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-28 23:20     ` [PATCHv3 " Joel Schopp
2010-01-28 23:20       ` Joel Schopp
2010-02-05 20:57       ` [PATCHv4 " Joel Schopp
2010-02-05 20:57         ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-20 20:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc: implement arch_scale_smt_power for Power7 Joel Schopp
2010-01-20 20:04   ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-20 20:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20 20:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20 21:58     ` Michael Neuling
2010-01-20 21:58       ` Michael Neuling
2010-01-20 22:44     ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-20 22:44       ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-21  8:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-21  8:27         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20 21:04   ` Michael Neuling
2010-01-20 21:04     ` Michael Neuling
2010-01-20 22:09     ` Joel Schopp [this message]
2010-01-20 22:09       ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-24  3:00       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-24  3:00         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-25 17:50         ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-25 17:50           ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-26  4:23           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-26  4:23             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-20 21:33   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-20 21:33     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-20 22:36     ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-20 22:36       ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-26 23:28   ` [PATCHv2 " Joel Schopp
2010-01-26 23:28     ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-27  0:52     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-27  0:52       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-28 22:39       ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-28 22:39         ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-29  1:23         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-29  1:23           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-28 23:20     ` [PATCHv3 " Joel Schopp
2010-01-28 23:20       ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-28 23:24       ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-28 23:24         ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-29  1:23         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-29  1:23           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-29 10:13           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 10:13             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 18:34             ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-29 18:34               ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-29 18:41           ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-29 18:41             ` Joel Schopp
2010-02-05 20:57         ` [PATCHv4 " Joel Schopp
2010-02-05 20:57           ` Joel Schopp
2010-02-14 10:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-14 10:12             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-17 22:20             ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-17 22:20               ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-18 13:17               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-18 13:17                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-18 13:19                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-18 13:19                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-18 16:28                 ` Joel Schopp
2010-02-18 16:28                   ` Joel Schopp
2010-02-18 17:08                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-18 17:08                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-19  6:05                 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-19  6:05                   ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-19 10:01                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-19 10:01                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-19 11:01                     ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-19 11:01                       ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-23  6:08                       ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-23  6:08                         ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-23 16:24                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-23 16:24                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-23 16:30                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-23 16:30                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-24  6:07                           ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-24  6:07                             ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-24 11:13                             ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-24 11:13                               ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-24 11:58                               ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-24 11:58                                 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-27 10:21                               ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-27 10:21                                 ` Michael Neuling
2010-03-02 14:44                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-02 14:44                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-04 22:28                                   ` Michael Neuling
2010-03-04 22:28                                     ` Michael Neuling
2010-01-29 12:25       ` [PATCHv3 " Gabriel Paubert
2010-01-29 12:25         ` Gabriel Paubert
2010-01-29 16:26         ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-29 16:26           ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-26 23:27 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] sched: arch_scale_smt_powers v2 Joel Schopp
2010-01-26 23:27   ` Joel Schopp
2010-01-28 23:20   ` [PATCHv3 0/2] sched: arch_scale_smt_powers Joel Schopp
2010-01-28 23:20     ` Joel Schopp
2010-02-05 20:57     ` [PATCHv4 " Joel Schopp
2010-02-05 20:57       ` Joel Schopp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B577F1A.9060907@austin.ibm.com \
    --to=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.