From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2] ext4: unmap the underlying metadata when allocating blocks via fallocate
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:43:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B5DBC15.9030004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100125090243.GA28459@thunk.org>
tytso@mit.edu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:42:05AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote:
>> My goal was to see if we can drop the BH_New flag when returning
>> preallocated blocks. But now i look at it again i guess you don't need
>> to take this patch. We cannot unmap underlying meta data during
>> fallocate because even if we remove the old mapping for the blocks,
>> we could reboot and later somebody(e2fsprogs) can directly read the blocks
>> and create a bh with old data. So i guess we should be doing
>> unmap_underlying_blocks when we are returning blocks to userspace or
>> when we actually zero out blocks.
>
> OK, so I'll drop this patch from the patch queue, and will do a full
> test run (XFSQA -g auto using both 1k and 4k block sizes) of the
> following patches:
>
> Aneesh Kumar K.V (3):
> ext4: Handle -EDQUOT error on write
> ext4: Fix quota accounting error with fallocate
> ext4: Drop EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UPDATE_RESERVE_SPACE flag
You may wish to add the patch from Jiaying (via me) as well, to handle
the blocks-past-eof case, if it's had sufficient review.
-Eric
> Of all of the patches in the ext4 patch queue, these seem to be the
> ones which need to be urgently pushed to Linus before 2.6.33.
>
> Any objections, or nominations for other patches that should go in
> before 2.6.33, please speak up now...
>
> - Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-25 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-06 19:22 [PATCH 1/3] ext4: Fix quota accounting error with fallocate Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-01-06 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: Drop EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_UPDATE_RESERVE_SPACE flag Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-01-06 19:50 ` Mingming
2010-01-06 19:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: unmap the underlying metadata when allocating blocks via fallocate Aneesh Kumar K.V
2010-01-06 20:20 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-14 17:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-14 18:30 ` [PATCH -V2] " Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-14 19:31 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-01-24 18:24 ` tytso
2010-01-25 5:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-25 9:02 ` tytso
2010-01-25 15:43 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-01-25 17:55 ` tytso
2010-01-25 18:21 ` Aneesh Kumar K. V
2010-01-06 19:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: Fix quota accounting error with fallocate Mingming
2010-01-13 14:55 ` [PATCH -V2] " Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B5DBC15.9030004@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.