All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Wozniak <awozniak@irobot.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] added new recipe for olsrd_0.5.6-r8
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:51:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B5DCC14.3030509@irobot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201001251102.50572.holger+oe@freyther.de>

It is "revision" 8, not "release candidate" 8.  If you look at  
http://www.olsr.org/releases/0.5/ you'll notice they ALSO have things 
labeled 0.5.6-rcN, but these all predate 0.5.6-rN.  I think their 
numbering scheme through 0.5.6 is horrible.  It gets worse...  Four days 
after they posted 0.5.6-r8, they decided to break convention again and 
posted 0.5.6-r8-2 (and not 0.5.6-r9 as you'd expect).

It is indeed unfortunate.

--Adam

Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Saturday 23 January 2010 00:22:37 Adam Wozniak wrote:
>   
>> Sorry, I've tried and tried, but I can't get send-email to work (network
>> config settings which are completely out of my control).  Please try
>> this attachment.
>>     
>
> The upstream version number of "olsrd_0.5.6-r8" is a bit unfortunate. Is that 
> revision or release candidate 8? This also means that the generated OE package 
> will be something like olsrd-0.5.6-r8-rX".
>
> In case it is the release version it is probably fine but just a little bit 
> awkward, in case of rc we would have a small problem.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>   




      reply	other threads:[~2010-01-25 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-19 22:55 [PATCH] added new recipe for olsrd_0.5.6-r8 Adam Wozniak
2010-01-21 22:47 ` Khem Raj
2010-01-22 23:22   ` Adam Wozniak
2010-01-23 14:15     ` Philip Balister
2010-01-25 10:02     ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2010-01-25 16:51       ` Adam Wozniak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B5DCC14.3030509@irobot.com \
    --to=awozniak@irobot.com \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.