All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Wozniak <awozniak@irobot.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Significiant performance differences between ath5k and ath9k in 802.11a
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:50:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B67147E.6080800@irobot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <774870.89795.qm@web51401.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

Your numbers for ath9k in the 5GHz band jibe with what I've observed for 
the ar9170 in ad-hoc mode.
If you go down to 2.4GHz you'll see about 16MBit/s.

I have no other numbers to offer for comparison.

--Adam

Joerg Pommnitz wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a strange performance problem with ath9k. I have two otherwise identical systems with an ath5k-supported card in system ATH5K and an ath9k supported card in system ATH9K.
> Doing an UDP iperf run were ATH5K is the client/sender and ATH9K is the server/receiver I easily get data rates of 31MBit/s (tx data rate on the sender is manually set to 54 MBit/s).
> Running the same test with ATH9K as client/sender and ATH5K as server/receiver gives maximum data rates of about 22MBit/s, about 30% less.
>
> Doing the test against another ath9k system (e.g. ATH9K ==> ATH9K2) gives
> the same max data rate of only 22 MBit/s, so the problem seems to be the
> ath9k driver or the hardware. Can anybody confirm these problems? Is this
> a known limitation? Any buttons to push to get things going faster?
>
> Details:
> the ath5k card is a AR2413 based design (Compex WLM54AG), the ath9k card
> is a AR9220 (Compex WLM200NX 6A). The systems are connected in IBSS mode 
> on channel 40 (5200MHz).
> The kernel version is wireless-testing as of January, 26. The kernel is
> slightly patched to enable IBSS in 802.11a (we are allowed to do this).
>
> Can anybody shed some light on this strange issue? Luis?
>
>   

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adam Wozniak <awozniak@irobot.com>
To: Joerg Pommnitz <pommnitz@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org,
	ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: Re: Significiant performance differences between ath5k and ath9k in 802.11a
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:50:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B67147E.6080800@irobot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <774870.89795.qm@web51401.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

Your numbers for ath9k in the 5GHz band jibe with what I've observed for 
the ar9170 in ad-hoc mode.
If you go down to 2.4GHz you'll see about 16MBit/s.

I have no other numbers to offer for comparison.

--Adam

Joerg Pommnitz wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a strange performance problem with ath9k. I have two otherwise identical systems with an ath5k-supported card in system ATH5K and an ath9k supported card in system ATH9K.
> Doing an UDP iperf run were ATH5K is the client/sender and ATH9K is the server/receiver I easily get data rates of 31MBit/s (tx data rate on the sender is manually set to 54 MBit/s).
> Running the same test with ATH9K as client/sender and ATH5K as server/receiver gives maximum data rates of about 22MBit/s, about 30% less.
>
> Doing the test against another ath9k system (e.g. ATH9K ==> ATH9K2) gives
> the same max data rate of only 22 MBit/s, so the problem seems to be the
> ath9k driver or the hardware. Can anybody confirm these problems? Is this
> a known limitation? Any buttons to push to get things going faster?
>
> Details:
> the ath5k card is a AR2413 based design (Compex WLM54AG), the ath9k card
> is a AR9220 (Compex WLM200NX 6A). The systems are connected in IBSS mode 
> on channel 40 (5200MHz).
> The kernel version is wireless-testing as of January, 26. The kernel is
> slightly patched to enable IBSS in 802.11a (we are allowed to do this).
>
> Can anybody shed some light on this strange issue? Luis?
>
>   


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-01 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-28 15:13 [ath9k-devel] Significiant performance differences between ath5k and ath9k in 802.11a Joerg Pommnitz
2010-01-28 15:13 ` Joerg Pommnitz
2010-01-28 16:12 ` [ath9k-devel] " rootkit85 at yahoo.it
2010-01-28 16:12   ` rootkit85
2010-01-29  8:10   ` Joerg Pommnitz
2010-01-29  8:10     ` Joerg Pommnitz
2010-01-29  8:23     ` Felix Fietkau
2010-01-29  8:23       ` Felix Fietkau
2010-01-29  8:46       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2010-02-04  8:31       ` Joerg Pommnitz
2010-02-04  8:31         ` Joerg Pommnitz
2010-02-01 17:50 ` Adam Wozniak [this message]
2010-02-01 17:50   ` Adam Wozniak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B67147E.6080800@irobot.com \
    --to=awozniak@irobot.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.