From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
To: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Cc: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>,
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 5/6] revert: add --ff option to allow fast forward when cherry-picking
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:56:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B67DAA9.4050709@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002020613.48067.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
>> and that even without
>> setting the variables, "git cherry-pick" will pick a new commit date but
>> "git cherry-pick --ff" wouldn't. The latter, I think is the only
>> difference that is worth pondering further.
>
> Because --no-ff could be used when the GIT_COMMITTER_* and GIT_AUTHOR_* env
> variable should be respected? Or because we should check if one of these
> env variable is set and, if that is the case, we should not fast forward?
I wish it could be the former, at least in the long run; after all git
merge fast-forwards by default, and it doesn't adjust its behavior if
GIT_COMMITTER_* is passed.
Anyway, your plan of starting with --ff and changing the default to
--no-ff later seems fine. Maybe you can add --no-ff now already, though
it would be a no-op.
>> Note that "-e --ff" would error out; however if --ff would be the
>> default, "-e" would probably choose between fast-forward and
>> non-fast-forward depending on whether the commit message was edited.
>
> Yeah, but let's change the default later please.
Sure.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-02 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-01 7:55 [RFC/PATCH 0/6] add --ff option to cherry-pick Christian Couder
2010-02-01 7:55 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/6] revert: libify cherry-pick and revert functionnality Christian Couder
2010-02-01 10:26 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-02-03 16:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-02-01 7:55 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/6] reset: refactor updating heads into a static function Christian Couder
2010-02-01 7:55 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/6] reset: refactor reseting in its own function Christian Couder
2010-02-01 7:55 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/6] reset: make reset function non static and declare it in "reset.h" Christian Couder
2010-02-01 7:55 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/6] revert: add --ff option to allow fast forward when cherry-picking Christian Couder
2010-02-01 11:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-01 12:43 ` Christian Couder
2010-02-01 14:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-02 5:13 ` Christian Couder
2010-02-02 7:56 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2010-02-01 7:55 ` [RFC/PATCH 6/6] rebase -i: use new --ff cherry-pick option Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B67DAA9.4050709@gnu.org \
--to=bonzini@gnu.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=s-beyer@gmx.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.