From: Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault@free.fr>
To: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Cc: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>,
jirislaby@gmail.com, mickflemm@gmail.com,
ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k: Fix TX/RX padding for all frames
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:01:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7B9438.9020601@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100217061523.GA5147@jm.kir.nu>
Jouni Malinen a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 09:39:25PM +0100, Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote:
>
>> I don't have an ath5k based card at hand. I will try to grab one and
>> will give an example of said frame. Basically, I followed the same
>> strategy for ath9k already.
>>
>
> Are you saying that this patch has not actually been tested at all on
> ath5k and it was just based on the changes you did for ath9k? If that is
> the case, I would suggest running the tests before actually applying
> this. We should really not depend on undocumented hardware behavior to
> remain the same between different revisions. That's why I did not like
> the changes in ath9k and would not exactly like extending that to even
> more different chips taken into account that none of this is needed for
> normal use of the card.
>
>
No. It has been tested the same way I tested ath9k, ie using 2 cards in
monitor mode and reading/writing 802.11 frame and checking that they are
the same on the other side. I just need to swap my ath9k based card
(AR9280) with an ath5k based card (AR5212) in my laptop and redo the
test. I will do so in a couple of days.
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-17 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-14 23:36 [PATCH] ath5k: Fix TX/RX padding for all frames Benoit Papillault
2010-02-15 20:15 ` Bob Copeland
2010-02-15 22:06 ` Benoit PAPILLAULT
2010-02-16 0:47 ` Bob Copeland
2010-02-16 20:39 ` Benoit PAPILLAULT
2010-02-17 6:15 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-02-17 7:01 ` Benoit PAPILLAULT [this message]
[not found] <--to jirislaby@gmail.com --to mickflemm@gmail.com \>
2010-02-27 12:58 ` Benoit Papillault
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-02-27 20:58 [ath5k-devel] " Benoit PAPILLAULT
2010-02-27 22:05 ` Benoit Papillault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B7B9438.9020601@free.fr \
--to=benoit.papillault@free.fr \
--cc=ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.