From: "U. George" <netbeans@gatworks.com>
To: ratheesh k <ratheesh.ksz@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multiport needs `-p tcp', `-p udp' - Why?
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:28:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B895655.90005@gatworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfeab66d1002270846q65493ac2y57ef59ca1eb2c650@mail.gmail.com>
source port offset for udp and tcp are both at 0 for IPv4
destination port offset for udp and tcp are both at 16 for IPv4
On 02/27/2010 11:46 AM, ratheesh k wrote:
> port offset may be differ based on which layer 4 protocol , you are
> using . If u dont specify protocol ( layer 4 ) , netfilter dont know
> this .
>
>
> Please find below some code sinppet from xt_multiport.c .
>
>
> 113 pptr = skb_header_pointer(skb, protoff, sizeof(_ports), _ports);
> 114 if (pptr == NULL) {
> 115 /* We've been asked to examine this packet, and we
> 116 * can't. Hence, no choice but to drop.
> 117 */
> 118 duprintf("xt_multiport: Dropping evil offset=0
> tinygram.\n");
> 119 *hotdrop = 1;
> 120 return 0;
> 121 }
> 122
> 123 return ports_match(multiinfo->ports,
> 124 multiinfo->flags, multiinfo->count,
> 125 ntohs(pptr[0]), ntohs(pptr[1]));
>
> thanks,
> Ratheesh
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:47 PM, U. George<netbeans@gatworks.com> wrote:
>> U'll have to let me know why "-p udp" is needed when the chain can only have
>> udp packets, and therefor can only process udp packets.
>>
>> I dont want to test over (( and over ) and over ) again when I know that the
>> packet is already KNOWN to be from eth1 and of protocol UDP.
>>
>> adding "-p UDP" to multiport does make iptables happy, but appears to be a
>> useless test.
>>
>> On 02/27/2010 10:06 AM, ratheesh k wrote:
>>>
>>> Port is in Layer 4 of protocol stack .
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 8:33 PM, U. George<netbeans@gatworks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In order to get to the chain, the protocol, as well as the interface must
>>>> match. PRE_UDP if already filtered for "-p udp" . So why does multiport
>>>> require another check for -p udp? Does it really need to have that option
>>>> in
>>>> order for it to work?
>>>>
>>>>> + /sbin/iptables -t filter -N PRE_UDP
>>>>> + /sbin/iptables -t filter -A INPUT -i eth1 -p udp -j PRE_UDP
>>>>> + /sbin/iptables -t filter -A PRE_UDP -m multiport --dport
>>>>> 137,138,139,512,514,515,1433,1434 -j DROP
>>>>> iptables v1.4.5: multiport needs `-p tcp', `-p udp', `-p udplite', `-p
>>>>> sctp' or `-p dccp'
>>>>> Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-27 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-27 15:03 multiport needs `-p tcp', `-p udp' - Why? U. George
2010-02-27 15:06 ` ratheesh k
2010-02-27 16:17 ` U. George
2010-02-27 16:46 ` ratheesh k
2010-02-27 17:28 ` U. George [this message]
2010-02-27 17:18 ` Dennis J.
2010-02-28 6:54 ` Mart Frauenlob
2010-02-28 10:53 ` ratheesh k
2010-02-28 13:59 ` U. George
2010-02-28 14:41 ` Mart Frauenlob
2010-02-28 15:17 ` U. George
[not found] <4b8984a7.0ab6660a.24bd.1f7f@mx.google.com>
2010-02-27 21:14 ` U. George
2010-02-28 4:46 ` ratheesh k
2010-02-28 6:38 ` Mart Frauenlob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B895655.90005@gatworks.com \
--to=netbeans@gatworks.com \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ratheesh.ksz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.