From: Mart Frauenlob <mart.frauenlob@chello.at>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multiport needs `-p tcp', `-p udp' - Why?
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:38:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8A0F5A.7060903@chello.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfeab66d1002272046o320823b3t49f90044da1253ce@mail.gmail.com>
On 28.02.2010 05:47, netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org wrote:
> George ,
>
> for -p option , we can specify icmp ( layer 3 protocol )
> or other layer 4 protocol other than UDP and TCP .
>
> I could be wrong . I am also a beginner .
>
> Thanks,
> Ratheesh.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 2:44 AM, U. George <netbeans@gatworks.com> wrote:
>> It makes no diff to either udp or tcp - port address are at the same header
>> offset. It does makes a difference if you want to test both in the rule. I
>> only want to test ports with this rule.
>>
>> On 02/27/2010 03:46 PM, richard.horton@solstans.co.uk wrote:
>> And as each rule is distinct the line with multiport does not know you have
>> already determined the protocol...
>> Ahhh, *But I know*. I designed the filter that way. If u want to *warn* me,
>> then thats probably ok.
>> --
Could you guys please stop top posting.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-28 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4b8984a7.0ab6660a.24bd.1f7f@mx.google.com>
2010-02-27 21:14 ` multiport needs `-p tcp', `-p udp' - Why? U. George
2010-02-28 4:46 ` ratheesh k
2010-02-28 6:38 ` Mart Frauenlob [this message]
2010-02-27 15:03 U. George
2010-02-27 15:06 ` ratheesh k
2010-02-27 16:17 ` U. George
2010-02-27 16:46 ` ratheesh k
2010-02-27 17:28 ` U. George
2010-02-27 17:18 ` Dennis J.
2010-02-28 6:54 ` Mart Frauenlob
2010-02-28 10:53 ` ratheesh k
2010-02-28 13:59 ` U. George
2010-02-28 14:41 ` Mart Frauenlob
2010-02-28 15:17 ` U. George
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B8A0F5A.7060903@chello.at \
--to=mart.frauenlob@chello.at \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.