From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk" <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm : remove redundant initialization of page->private
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:55:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B98B018.4020103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B98AF1B.80701@siemens.com>
On 03/11/2010 10:51 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 03/10/2010 04:31 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>
>>> The prep_new_page() in page allocator calls set_page_private(page, 0).
>>> So we don't need to reinitialize private of page.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Applied, thanks. Please copy the kvm mailing list in the future on kvm
>> patches.
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>>> index 741373e..9851d0e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>>> @@ -326,7 +326,6 @@ static int mmu_topup_memory_cache_page(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
>>> page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
>>> if (!page)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>> - set_page_private(page, 0);
>>> cache->objects[cache->nobjs++] = page_address(page);
>>> }
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>>
>> Jan, this is kvm-kmod unfriendly. kvm_alloc_page()?
>>
>>
> Thanks for pointing out! Since which kernel can we rely on the implicit
> set_page_private?
>
>
Um, git blame shows it goes all the way back to 2.6.12. So it was
redundant all along.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-11 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-08 9:33 [PATCH] shmem : remove redundant code Huang Shijie
2010-03-08 16:04 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-09 2:02 ` Huang Shijie
2010-03-08 16:20 ` [PATCH] kvm : remove redundant initialization of page->private Minchan Kim
2010-03-10 10:19 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-10 14:31 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-11 7:42 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-11 8:51 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-03-11 8:55 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-03-11 18:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-03-09 21:25 ` [PATCH] shmem : remove redundant code Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B98B018.4020103@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.