From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.33 crash: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP: EIP: [<c11a018b>] assfail+0x1b/0x20 SS:ESP 0068:f687bf14
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:46:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B9E4863.80905@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003151042390.9496@p34.internal.lan>
Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>> Specifications:
>>>
>>> 2.6.33
>>> 32bit
>>> Debian Testing
>>>
>>> On Mar 14th, my server hung up:
>>>
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189675] ------------[ cut here
>>> ]------------
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189679] invalid opcode: 0000
>>> [#1] SMP
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189681] last sysfs file:
>>> /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:0e.0/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/block/sda/uevent
>>>
>>>
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189704] Process xfssyncd (pid:
>>> 584, ti=f687a000 task=f70fa400 task.ti=f687a000)
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189705] Stack:
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189721] Call Trace:
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189739] Code: 00 e8 ea e5 01 00
>>> 83 c4 14 c3 8d b6 00 00 00 00 83 ec 10 89 4c 24 0c 89 54 24 08 89 44 24
>>> 04 c7 04 24 30 ab 42 c1 e8 7c 11 1c 00 <0f> 0b eb fe 90 55 57 89 cf 56
>>> 89 c6 b8 80 b0 52 c1 83 e6 07 53
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189739] EIP: [<c11a018b>]
>>> assfail+0x1b/0x20 SS:ESP 0068:f687bf14
>>>
>>> Is this a bug related to AMD (CPU) or XFS?
>>
>> Hard to know without seeing the rest of the stack trace, is this all
>> you got?
> Yes, that was the only entry in the log file, I could not wake up the
> monitor to get any more information.
>
>>
>> You hit an assertion failure in xfs.
>>
>> Are you running with CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG?
> Nope.
>
> CONFIG_XFS_FS=y
> # CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA is not set
> # CONFIG_XFS_POSIX_ACL is not set
> # CONFIG_XFS_RT is not set
> # CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG is not set
Ok, then you hit an ASSERT_ALWAYS
There are only a few:
0 xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c xfs_fs_destroy_inode 953 ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE));
1 xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c xfs_fs_destroy_inode 954 ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM));
2 xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c xfs_reclaim_inode 727 ASSERT_ALWAYS(__xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE));
3 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c xfs_log_notify 376 ASSERT_ALWAYS((iclog->ic_state == XLOG_STATE_ACTIVE) ||
4 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c xlog_commit_record 1273 ASSERT_ALWAYS(iclog);
but I'm not sure which one you hit since there is no backtrace provided.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.33 crash: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP: EIP: [<c11a018b>] assfail+0x1b/0x20 SS:ESP 0068:f687bf14
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:46:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B9E4863.80905@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003151042390.9496@p34.internal.lan>
Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>> Specifications:
>>>
>>> 2.6.33
>>> 32bit
>>> Debian Testing
>>>
>>> On Mar 14th, my server hung up:
>>>
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189675] ------------[ cut here
>>> ]------------
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189679] invalid opcode: 0000
>>> [#1] SMP
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189681] last sysfs file:
>>> /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:0e.0/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/block/sda/uevent
>>>
>>>
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189704] Process xfssyncd (pid:
>>> 584, ti=f687a000 task=f70fa400 task.ti=f687a000)
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189705] Stack:
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189721] Call Trace:
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189739] Code: 00 e8 ea e5 01 00
>>> 83 c4 14 c3 8d b6 00 00 00 00 83 ec 10 89 4c 24 0c 89 54 24 08 89 44 24
>>> 04 c7 04 24 30 ab 42 c1 e8 7c 11 1c 00 <0f> 0b eb fe 90 55 57 89 cf 56
>>> 89 c6 b8 80 b0 52 c1 83 e6 07 53
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189739] EIP: [<c11a018b>]
>>> assfail+0x1b/0x20 SS:ESP 0068:f687bf14
>>>
>>> Is this a bug related to AMD (CPU) or XFS?
>>
>> Hard to know without seeing the rest of the stack trace, is this all
>> you got?
> Yes, that was the only entry in the log file, I could not wake up the
> monitor to get any more information.
>
>>
>> You hit an assertion failure in xfs.
>>
>> Are you running with CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG?
> Nope.
>
> CONFIG_XFS_FS=y
> # CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA is not set
> # CONFIG_XFS_POSIX_ACL is not set
> # CONFIG_XFS_RT is not set
> # CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG is not set
Ok, then you hit an ASSERT_ALWAYS
There are only a few:
0 xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c xfs_fs_destroy_inode 953 ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE));
1 xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c xfs_fs_destroy_inode 954 ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM));
2 xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c xfs_reclaim_inode 727 ASSERT_ALWAYS(__xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE));
3 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c xfs_log_notify 376 ASSERT_ALWAYS((iclog->ic_state == XLOG_STATE_ACTIVE) ||
4 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c xlog_commit_record 1273 ASSERT_ALWAYS(iclog);
but I'm not sure which one you hit since there is no backtrace provided.
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-15 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-15 9:32 2.6.33 crash: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP: EIP: [<c11a018b>] assfail+0x1b/0x20 SS:ESP 0068:f687bf14 Justin Piszcz
2010-03-15 9:32 ` Justin Piszcz
2010-03-15 14:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-03-15 14:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-03-15 14:44 ` Justin Piszcz
2010-03-15 14:44 ` Justin Piszcz
2010-03-15 14:46 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-03-15 14:46 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-03-15 15:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-15 15:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-15 15:21 ` Justin Piszcz
2010-03-15 15:21 ` Justin Piszcz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B9E4863.80905@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.