From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@petalogix.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/of: Fix comparison of "compatible" properties
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:03:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA25CE7.5040204@petalogix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa41003171735v1e9b62bci9273b6ae0e7b7a15@mail.gmail.com>
Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>> Commit 7c7b60cb87547b1664a4385c187f029bf514a737
>> "of: put default string compare and #a/s-cell values into common header"
>>
>> Breaks various things on powerpc due to using strncasecmp instead of
>> strcasecmp for comparing against "compatible" strings.
>>
>> This causes things like the 4xx PCI code to fail miserably due to the
>> partial matches in code like this:
>>
>> for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, "ibm,plb-pcix")
>> ppc4xx_probe_pcix_bridge(np);
>> for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, "ibm,plb-pci")
>> ppc4xx_probe_pci_bridge(np);
>>
>> This reverts us to use strcasecmp. I do wonder why microblase and sparc
>> want the partial matches though. For sparc it could be historical, but
>> microblaze might want to change.
>>
>> It's not quite right to do partial name match. Entries in a compatible
>> list are meant to be matched whole. If a device is compatible with both
>> "foo" and "foo1", then the device should have both strings in its
>> "compatible" property.
>
> Hmmm. That's a mistake I made then in commit 7c7b60cb. I had meant
> to use strcasecmp(), and had missed that microblaze was doing it
> differently. I certainly don't want to carry over partial name match
> when other architectures pick up device tree support. If anything,
> microblaze should have the exception and the common code fixed.
>
> Michal, why does microblaze differ from powerpc on this point?
As I wrote. Microblaze doesn't need any partial name match.
Michal
>
> Cheers,
> g.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h
>> index ddd408a..47ce796 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h
>> @@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
>> #include <asm/irq.h>
>> #include <asm/atomic.h>
>>
>> +/* We do -not- want the generic "strncasecmp" here for of_compat_cmp.
>> + * We have cases where we could otherwise mismatch "pcix" and "pci"
>> + * and similar.
>> + */
>> +#define of_compat_cmp(s1, s2, l) strcasecmp((s1), (s2))
>> +#define of_prop_cmp(s1, s2) strcmp((s1), (s2))
>> +#define of_node_cmp(s1, s2) strcasecmp((s1), (s2))
>> +
>> #define HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek-g5w7nrANp4BDPfheJLI6IQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
linuxppc-dev
<linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
microblaze-uclinux-rVRm/Wmeqae7NGdpmJTKYQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/of: Fix comparison of "compatible" properties
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:03:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA25CE7.5040204@petalogix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa41003171735v1e9b62bci9273b6ae0e7b7a15-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Commit 7c7b60cb87547b1664a4385c187f029bf514a737
>> "of: put default string compare and #a/s-cell values into common header"
>>
>> Breaks various things on powerpc due to using strncasecmp instead of
>> strcasecmp for comparing against "compatible" strings.
>>
>> This causes things like the 4xx PCI code to fail miserably due to the
>> partial matches in code like this:
>>
>> for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, "ibm,plb-pcix")
>> ppc4xx_probe_pcix_bridge(np);
>> for_each_compatible_node(np, NULL, "ibm,plb-pci")
>> ppc4xx_probe_pci_bridge(np);
>>
>> This reverts us to use strcasecmp. I do wonder why microblase and sparc
>> want the partial matches though. For sparc it could be historical, but
>> microblaze might want to change.
>>
>> It's not quite right to do partial name match. Entries in a compatible
>> list are meant to be matched whole. If a device is compatible with both
>> "foo" and "foo1", then the device should have both strings in its
>> "compatible" property.
>
> Hmmm. That's a mistake I made then in commit 7c7b60cb. I had meant
> to use strcasecmp(), and had missed that microblaze was doing it
> differently. I certainly don't want to carry over partial name match
> when other architectures pick up device tree support. If anything,
> microblaze should have the exception and the common code fixed.
>
> Michal, why does microblaze differ from powerpc on this point?
As I wrote. Microblaze doesn't need any partial name match.
Michal
>
> Cheers,
> g.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h
>> index ddd408a..47ce796 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h
>> @@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
>> #include <asm/irq.h>
>> #include <asm/atomic.h>
>>
>> +/* We do -not- want the generic "strncasecmp" here for of_compat_cmp.
>> + * We have cases where we could otherwise mismatch "pcix" and "pci"
>> + * and similar.
>> + */
>> +#define of_compat_cmp(s1, s2, l) strcasecmp((s1), (s2))
>> +#define of_prop_cmp(s1, s2) strcmp((s1), (s2))
>> +#define of_node_cmp(s1, s2) strcasecmp((s1), (s2))
>> +
>> #define HAVE_ARCH_DEVTREE_FIXUPS
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-18 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 0:09 [PATCH] powerpc/of: Fix comparison of "compatible" properties Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-18 0:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-18 0:35 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 0:35 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 17:03 ` Michal Simek [this message]
2010-03-18 17:03 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA25CE7.5040204@petalogix.com \
--to=michal.simek@petalogix.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.