* [refpolicy] I know we have had this debate before but shouldn't cron be running jobs as the users domain.
@ 2010-03-23 14:11 Daniel J Walsh
2010-03-25 14:30 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel J Walsh @ 2010-03-23 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: refpolicy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575560
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [refpolicy] I know we have had this debate before but shouldn't cron be running jobs as the users domain.
2010-03-23 14:11 [refpolicy] I know we have had this debate before but shouldn't cron be running jobs as the users domain Daniel J Walsh
@ 2010-03-25 14:30 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christopher J. PeBenito @ 2010-03-25 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: refpolicy
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 10:11 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575560
I thought I said this before, but I don't have a problem with it, but I
still want to keep the cronjob domain around in case someone wants a
more restrictive domain.
--
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-25 14:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-23 14:11 [refpolicy] I know we have had this debate before but shouldn't cron be running jobs as the users domain Daniel J Walsh
2010-03-25 14:30 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.