All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpuset,mm: update task's mems_allowed lazily
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:56:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BAB5D7F.5010401@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BAB39B9.7080600@cn.fujitsu.com>

on 2010-3-25 18:23, Miao Xie wrote:
> on 2010-3-11 19:03, Nick Piggin wrote:
>> Well... I do think seqlocks would be a bit simpler because they don't
>> require this checking and synchronizing of this patch.
> 
> Hi, Nick Piggin
> 
> I have made a new patch which uses seqlock to protect mems_allowed and mempolicy.
> please review it.
> 
> title: [PATCH -mmotm] cpuset,mm: use seqlock to protect task->mempolicy and mems_allowed
> 

Sorry! Please ignore this patch, because I sent an old version. I'll send the new one later.

Regards!
Miao


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpuset,mm: update task's mems_allowed lazily
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:56:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BAB5D7F.5010401@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BAB39B9.7080600@cn.fujitsu.com>

on 2010-3-25 18:23, Miao Xie wrote:
> on 2010-3-11 19:03, Nick Piggin wrote:
>> Well... I do think seqlocks would be a bit simpler because they don't
>> require this checking and synchronizing of this patch.
> 
> Hi, Nick Piggin
> 
> I have made a new patch which uses seqlock to protect mems_allowed and mempolicy.
> please review it.
> 
> title: [PATCH -mmotm] cpuset,mm: use seqlock to protect task->mempolicy and mems_allowed
> 

Sorry! Please ignore this patch, because I sent an old version. I'll send the new one later.

Regards!
Miao

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-25 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-08 10:10 [PATCH V2 4/4] cpuset,mm: update task's mems_allowed lazily Miao Xie
2010-03-08 10:10 ` Miao Xie
2010-03-08 21:46 ` David Rientjes
2010-03-08 21:46   ` David Rientjes
2010-03-09  7:25   ` Miao Xie
2010-03-09  7:25     ` Miao Xie
2010-03-11  8:15     ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-11  8:15       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-11 10:33       ` Miao Xie
2010-03-11 10:33         ` Miao Xie
2010-03-11 11:03         ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-11 11:03           ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-25 10:23           ` Miao Xie
2010-03-25 10:23             ` Miao Xie
2010-03-25 12:56             ` Miao Xie [this message]
2010-03-25 12:56               ` Miao Xie
2010-03-25 13:33           ` [PATCH] [PATCH -mmotm] cpuset,mm: use seqlock to protect task->mempolicy and mems_allowed (v2) (was: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] cpuset,mm: update task's mems_allowed lazily) Miao Xie
2010-03-25 13:33             ` Miao Xie
2010-03-28  5:30             ` Bob Liu
2010-03-28  5:30               ` Bob Liu
2010-03-31 19:42             ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 19:42               ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31  9:54           ` [PATCH V2 4/4] cpuset,mm: update task's mems_allowed lazily Miao Xie
2010-03-31  9:54             ` Miao Xie
2010-03-31 10:34             ` David Rientjes
2010-03-31 10:34               ` David Rientjes
2010-04-01  2:16               ` Miao Xie
2010-04-01  2:16                 ` Miao Xie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BAB5D7F.5010401@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.