Re: Request for branch merge

[Philip Balister <philip@balister.org>]

On 04/01/2010 05:08 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01-04-10 22:34, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 13:03 -0700, Chris Larson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Koen Kooi<k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> On 01-04-10 17:33, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I could post the patches individually and get Acked lines for each one
>>>>> but I'm hoping to avoid that and get permission to merge the branch
>>>>> directly. We have talked about most of these things in one form or
>>>>> another.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think this will get serious review people other than Tom, Khem
>>>> and Chris, so if they don't have huge objections, merge it and we'll
>>>> deal with the fallout together if needed.
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree with Koen on this, it's a definite improvement. Let's get it merged
>>> and deal with any fallout from there.
>>
>> Generally yes, and just a few things to hash out over the weekend I
>> think.
>
> I'm going to steal Chris' thunder a bit, but during the TSC meeting we
> agreed that "after the weekend" would be a better time to merge it than
> "now". Dealing with the fallout required lots of attention, which boils
> down to "office hours" for most of the involved.

Thanks. I know the people who do work on OE over the weekends appreciate 
this.

Philip