* Re: Reading entropy_avail file appears to consume entropy
2010-04-05 7:50 ` Reading entropy_avail file appears to consume entropy Jan Ceuleers
@ 2010-04-05 9:30 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-04-05 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Ceuleers; +Cc: Alexander Konovalenko, linux-kernel
Le lundi 05 avril 2010 à 09:50 +0200, Jan Ceuleers a écrit :
> Alexander Konovalenko wrote:
> > On Mar 19, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> >> I'm using the 2.6.31 kernel that comes with Ubuntu 9.10.
> >>
> >> If I
> >>
> >> # watch cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail
> >>
> >> then the size of the entropy pool falls rapidly (by more than 200 bytes per 2s interval).
> >> It settles down around 160 bytes.
> >
> > Jan, did you find out anything interesting about this issue?
> >
> > I have a wild guess, although I have no idea whether it can be
> > correct. I couldn't catch any user-space /dev/random or /dev/urandom
> > readers with fuser, so I think something in the kernel is using up the
> > entropy. If I remember correctly, recent Ubuntu releases were supposed
> > to include a security feature that randomizes memory layout in order
> > to mitigate some kinds of security vulnerabilities. What if each time
> > a new process is started the kernel needs to obtain a significant
> > number of random bytes? Here is some supporting evidence. I can
> > reproduce the behavior you describe on a vanilla Ubuntu 9.10 system
> > (without latest updates). But if I watch entropy_avail using a Python
> > script that does not start a new process every time, then the
> > available entropy amount won't decrease. (The system is otherwise
> > idle.) Give it a try:
> >
> > $ python
> > import sys, time
> > while True:
> > sys.stdout.write(open('/proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail',
> > 'r').read())
> > time.sleep(1)
> >
> > It would be great if someone with knowledge about this could confirm
> > or refute my guess.
> >
> > -- Alexander
> >
>
> Alexander,
>
> Thanks, this never made it out to LKML so I'm forwarding it now.
>
> This does sound quite plausible; does anyone from Ubuntu want to chip in?
>
Nothing related to Ubuntu I guess
commit f06295b44c296c8fb08823a3118468ae343b60f2
Author: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
Date: Wed Jan 7 18:08:52 2009 -0800
ELF: implement AT_RANDOM for glibc PRNG seeding
While discussing[1] the need for glibc to have access to random bytes
during program load, it seems that an earlier attempt to implement
AT_RANDOM got stalled. This implements a random 16 byte string, available
to every ELF program via a new auxv AT_RANDOM vector.
[1] http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2008-10/msg00006.html
Ulrich said:
glibc needs right after startup a bit of random data for internal
protections (stack canary etc). What is now in upstream glibc is that we
always unconditionally open /dev/urandom, read some data, and use it. For
every process startup. That's slow.
...
The solution is to provide a limited amount of random data to the
starting process in the aux vector. I suggested 16 bytes and this is
what the patch implements. If we need only 16 bytes or less we use the
data directly. If we need more we'll use the 16 bytes to see a PRNG.
This avoids the costly /dev/urandom use and it allows the kernel to use
the most adequate source of random data for this purpose. It might not
be the same pool as that for /dev/urandom.
Concerns were expressed about the depletion of the randomness pool. But
this patch doesn't make the situation worse, it doesn't deplete entropy
more than happens now.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread