All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	John Berthels <john@humyo.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Gregory <nick@humyo.com>,
	Rob Sanderson <rob@humyo.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM + POSS FIX: kernel stack overflow, xfs, many disks, heavy write load, 8k stack, x86-64
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:05:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBF6C51.5030203@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100409113850.GE13327@think>

Chris Mason wrote:

> shrink_zone on my box isn't 500 bytes, but lets try the easy stuff
> first.  This is against .34, if you have any trouble applying to .32,
> just add the word noinline after the word static on the function
> definitions.
> 
> This makes shrink_zone disappear from my check_stack.pl output.
> Basically I think the compiler is inlining the shrink_active_zone and
> shrink_inactive_zone code into shrink_zone.
> 
> -chris
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 79c8098..c70593e 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static enum page_references page_check_references(struct page *page,
>  /*
>   * shrink_page_list() returns the number of reclaimed pages
>   */
> -static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
> +static noinline unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,

FWIW akpm suggested that I add:

/*
 * Rather then using noinline to prevent stack consumption, use
 * noinline_for_stack instead.  For documentaiton reasons.
 */
#define noinline_for_stack noinline

so maybe for a formal submission that'd be good to use.


>  					struct scan_control *sc,
>  					enum pageout_io sync_writeback)
>  {
> @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone, int file,
>   * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_zone().  It returns the number
>   * of reclaimed pages
>   */
> -static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan,
> +static noinline unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan,
>  			struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>  			int priority, int file)
>  {
> @@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ static void move_active_pages_to_lru(struct zone *zone,
>  		__count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, pgmoved);
>  }
>  
> -static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
> +static noinline void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
>  			struct scan_control *sc, int priority, int file)
>  {
>  	unsigned long nr_taken;
> @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ static int inactive_list_is_low(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>  		return inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc);
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> +static noinline unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  	struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc, int priority)
>  {
>  	int file = is_file_lru(lru);
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	John Berthels <john@humyo.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Gregory <nick@humyo.com>,
	Rob Sanderson <rob@humyo.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM + POSS FIX: kernel stack overflow, xfs, many disks,	heavy write load, 8k stack, x86-64
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:05:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBF6C51.5030203@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100409113850.GE13327@think>

Chris Mason wrote:

> shrink_zone on my box isn't 500 bytes, but lets try the easy stuff
> first.  This is against .34, if you have any trouble applying to .32,
> just add the word noinline after the word static on the function
> definitions.
> 
> This makes shrink_zone disappear from my check_stack.pl output.
> Basically I think the compiler is inlining the shrink_active_zone and
> shrink_inactive_zone code into shrink_zone.
> 
> -chris
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 79c8098..c70593e 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static enum page_references page_check_references(struct page *page,
>  /*
>   * shrink_page_list() returns the number of reclaimed pages
>   */
> -static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
> +static noinline unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,

FWIW akpm suggested that I add:

/*
 * Rather then using noinline to prevent stack consumption, use
 * noinline_for_stack instead.  For documentaiton reasons.
 */
#define noinline_for_stack noinline

so maybe for a formal submission that'd be good to use.


>  					struct scan_control *sc,
>  					enum pageout_io sync_writeback)
>  {
> @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone, int file,
>   * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_zone().  It returns the number
>   * of reclaimed pages
>   */
> -static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan,
> +static noinline unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan,
>  			struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>  			int priority, int file)
>  {
> @@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ static void move_active_pages_to_lru(struct zone *zone,
>  		__count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, pgmoved);
>  }
>  
> -static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
> +static noinline void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
>  			struct scan_control *sc, int priority, int file)
>  {
>  	unsigned long nr_taken;
> @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ static int inactive_list_is_low(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>  		return inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc);
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> +static noinline unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  	struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc, int priority)
>  {
>  	int file = is_file_lru(lru);
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	John Berthels <john@humyo.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Gregory <nick@humyo.com>,
	Rob Sanderson <rob@humyo.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM + POSS FIX: kernel stack overflow, xfs, many disks,	heavy write load, 8k stack, x86-64
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:05:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBF6C51.5030203@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100409113850.GE13327@think>

Chris Mason wrote:

> shrink_zone on my box isn't 500 bytes, but lets try the easy stuff
> first.  This is against .34, if you have any trouble applying to .32,
> just add the word noinline after the word static on the function
> definitions.
> 
> This makes shrink_zone disappear from my check_stack.pl output.
> Basically I think the compiler is inlining the shrink_active_zone and
> shrink_inactive_zone code into shrink_zone.
> 
> -chris
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 79c8098..c70593e 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static enum page_references page_check_references(struct page *page,
>  /*
>   * shrink_page_list() returns the number of reclaimed pages
>   */
> -static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
> +static noinline unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,

FWIW akpm suggested that I add:

/*
 * Rather then using noinline to prevent stack consumption, use
 * noinline_for_stack instead.  For documentaiton reasons.
 */
#define noinline_for_stack noinline

so maybe for a formal submission that'd be good to use.


>  					struct scan_control *sc,
>  					enum pageout_io sync_writeback)
>  {
> @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone, int file,
>   * shrink_inactive_list() is a helper for shrink_zone().  It returns the number
>   * of reclaimed pages
>   */
> -static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan,
> +static noinline unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan,
>  			struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>  			int priority, int file)
>  {
> @@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ static void move_active_pages_to_lru(struct zone *zone,
>  		__count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, pgmoved);
>  }
>  
> -static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
> +static noinline void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
>  			struct scan_control *sc, int priority, int file)
>  {
>  	unsigned long nr_taken;
> @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@ static int inactive_list_is_low(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
>  		return inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc);
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> +static noinline unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>  	struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc, int priority)
>  {
>  	int file = is_file_lru(lru);
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-09 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-07 11:06 PROBLEM + POSS FIX: kernel stack overflow, xfs, many disks, heavy write load, 8k stack, x86-64 John Berthels
2010-04-07 14:05 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-07 14:05   ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-07 15:57   ` John Berthels
2010-04-07 15:57     ` John Berthels
2010-04-07 17:43     ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-07 17:43       ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-07 23:43     ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-07 23:43       ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-08  3:03       ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-08  3:03         ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-08  3:03         ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-08 12:16         ` John Berthels
2010-04-08 12:16           ` John Berthels
2010-04-08 12:16           ` John Berthels
2010-04-08 14:47           ` John Berthels
2010-04-08 14:47             ` John Berthels
2010-04-08 14:47             ` John Berthels
2010-04-08 16:18             ` John Berthels
2010-04-08 16:18               ` John Berthels
2010-04-08 16:18               ` John Berthels
2010-04-08 23:38             ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-08 23:38               ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-08 23:38               ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-09 11:38               ` Chris Mason
2010-04-09 11:38                 ` Chris Mason
2010-04-09 11:38                 ` Chris Mason
2010-04-09 18:05                 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-04-09 18:05                   ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-09 18:05                   ` Eric Sandeen
2010-04-09 18:11                   ` Chris Mason
2010-04-09 18:11                     ` Chris Mason
2010-04-09 18:11                     ` Chris Mason
2010-04-12  1:01                     ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-12  1:01                       ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-12  1:01                       ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-13  9:51                 ` John Berthels
2010-04-13  9:51                   ` John Berthels
2010-04-16 13:41                 ` John Berthels
2010-04-16 13:41                   ` John Berthels
2010-04-16 13:41                   ` John Berthels
2010-04-09 13:43               ` John Berthels
2010-04-09 13:43                 ` John Berthels

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BBF6C51.5030203@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=john@humyo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nick@humyo.com \
    --cc=rob@humyo.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.