All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	anthony@codemonkey.ws, aliguori@us.ibm.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
	ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] Introduce bit-based phys_ram_dirty for VGA, CODE, MIGRATION and MASTER.
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:39:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC2EA64.6060700@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BC2D340.2030402@redhat.com>

Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/06/2010 03:51 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
>> Replaces byte-based phys_ram_dirty bitmap with three bit-based
>> phys_ram_dirty
>> bitmap. On allocation, it sets all bits in the bitmap.
>>
>>
>
>> index c74b0a4..9733892 100644
>> --- a/exec.c
>> +++ b/exec.c
>> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ uint8_t *code_gen_ptr;
>>
>> #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>> int phys_ram_fd;
>> -uint8_t *phys_ram_dirty;
>> +unsigned long *phys_ram_dirty[NUM_DIRTY_FLAGS];
>> static int in_migration;
>>
>> typedef struct RAMBlock {
>> @@ -2825,10 +2825,32 @@ ram_addr_t qemu_ram_alloc(ram_addr_t size)
>> new_block->next = ram_blocks;
>> ram_blocks = new_block;
>>
>> - phys_ram_dirty = qemu_realloc(phys_ram_dirty,
>> - (last_ram_offset + size)>> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
>> - memset(phys_ram_dirty + (last_ram_offset>> TARGET_PAGE_BITS),
>> - 0xff, size>> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
>> +/* temporarily copy from qemu-kvm.git/qemu-kvm.h */
>> +#define ALIGN(x, y) (((x)+(y)-1)& ~((y)-1))
>> +#define BITMAP_SIZE(m) (ALIGN(((m)>>TARGET_PAGE_BITS),
>> HOST_LONG_BITS) / 8)
>
> Please put in some header file, maybe qemu-common.h.

OK.  BTW, is qemu-kvm.h planned to go upstream?

>> +
>> + if (BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset + size) !=
>> BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset)) {
>> + phys_ram_dirty[MASTER_DIRTY_FLAG] =
>> + qemu_realloc(phys_ram_dirty[MASTER_DIRTY_FLAG],
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset + size));
>> + phys_ram_dirty[VGA_DIRTY_FLAG]
>> + = qemu_realloc(phys_ram_dirty[VGA_DIRTY_FLAG],
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset + size));
>> + phys_ram_dirty[CODE_DIRTY_FLAG] =
>> + qemu_realloc(phys_ram_dirty[CODE_DIRTY_FLAG],
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset + size));
>> + phys_ram_dirty[MIGRATION_DIRTY_FLAG] =
>> + qemu_realloc(phys_ram_dirty[MIGRATION_DIRTY_FLAG],
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset + size));
>> + memset((uint8_t *)phys_ram_dirty[MASTER_DIRTY_FLAG] +
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset), 0xff, BITMAP_SIZE(size));
>> + memset((uint8_t *)phys_ram_dirty[VGA_DIRTY_FLAG] +
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset), 0xff, BITMAP_SIZE(size));
>> + memset((uint8_t *)phys_ram_dirty[CODE_DIRTY_FLAG] +
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset), 0xff, BITMAP_SIZE(size));
>> + memset((uint8_t *)phys_ram_dirty[MIGRATION_DIRTY_FLAG] +
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset), 0xff, BITMAP_SIZE(size));
>> + }
>>
>
> Should be nicer as a loop calling a helper to allocate each bitmap. This
> patch won't work by itself, will it? I think you need to merge it with
> the succeeding patches.

Yeah.  I originally wrote as you suggested, but I needed to skip 0x03 because of 
the reason written below.

> +/* Use DIRTY_FLAG as indexes of bit-based phys_ram_dirty.
> +   0x03 is empty to make it compatible with byte-based bitmap. */
> +#define MASTER_DIRTY_FLAG    0x00
>  #define VGA_DIRTY_FLAG       0x01
>  #define CODE_DIRTY_FLAG      0x02
> -#define MIGRATION_DIRTY_FLAG 0x08
> +#define MIGRATION_DIRTY_FLAG 0x04

If you think if (i != 0x03) is better, I would modify it to a loop.

And sorry, you need to merge the succeeding patches to make it work.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, mtosatti@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] Introduce bit-based phys_ram_dirty for VGA, CODE, MIGRATION and MASTER.
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:39:48 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC2EA64.6060700@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BC2D340.2030402@redhat.com>

Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/06/2010 03:51 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
>> Replaces byte-based phys_ram_dirty bitmap with three bit-based
>> phys_ram_dirty
>> bitmap. On allocation, it sets all bits in the bitmap.
>>
>>
>
>> index c74b0a4..9733892 100644
>> --- a/exec.c
>> +++ b/exec.c
>> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ uint8_t *code_gen_ptr;
>>
>> #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>> int phys_ram_fd;
>> -uint8_t *phys_ram_dirty;
>> +unsigned long *phys_ram_dirty[NUM_DIRTY_FLAGS];
>> static int in_migration;
>>
>> typedef struct RAMBlock {
>> @@ -2825,10 +2825,32 @@ ram_addr_t qemu_ram_alloc(ram_addr_t size)
>> new_block->next = ram_blocks;
>> ram_blocks = new_block;
>>
>> - phys_ram_dirty = qemu_realloc(phys_ram_dirty,
>> - (last_ram_offset + size)>> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
>> - memset(phys_ram_dirty + (last_ram_offset>> TARGET_PAGE_BITS),
>> - 0xff, size>> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
>> +/* temporarily copy from qemu-kvm.git/qemu-kvm.h */
>> +#define ALIGN(x, y) (((x)+(y)-1)& ~((y)-1))
>> +#define BITMAP_SIZE(m) (ALIGN(((m)>>TARGET_PAGE_BITS),
>> HOST_LONG_BITS) / 8)
>
> Please put in some header file, maybe qemu-common.h.

OK.  BTW, is qemu-kvm.h planned to go upstream?

>> +
>> + if (BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset + size) !=
>> BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset)) {
>> + phys_ram_dirty[MASTER_DIRTY_FLAG] =
>> + qemu_realloc(phys_ram_dirty[MASTER_DIRTY_FLAG],
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset + size));
>> + phys_ram_dirty[VGA_DIRTY_FLAG]
>> + = qemu_realloc(phys_ram_dirty[VGA_DIRTY_FLAG],
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset + size));
>> + phys_ram_dirty[CODE_DIRTY_FLAG] =
>> + qemu_realloc(phys_ram_dirty[CODE_DIRTY_FLAG],
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset + size));
>> + phys_ram_dirty[MIGRATION_DIRTY_FLAG] =
>> + qemu_realloc(phys_ram_dirty[MIGRATION_DIRTY_FLAG],
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset + size));
>> + memset((uint8_t *)phys_ram_dirty[MASTER_DIRTY_FLAG] +
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset), 0xff, BITMAP_SIZE(size));
>> + memset((uint8_t *)phys_ram_dirty[VGA_DIRTY_FLAG] +
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset), 0xff, BITMAP_SIZE(size));
>> + memset((uint8_t *)phys_ram_dirty[CODE_DIRTY_FLAG] +
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset), 0xff, BITMAP_SIZE(size));
>> + memset((uint8_t *)phys_ram_dirty[MIGRATION_DIRTY_FLAG] +
>> + BITMAP_SIZE(last_ram_offset), 0xff, BITMAP_SIZE(size));
>> + }
>>
>
> Should be nicer as a loop calling a helper to allocate each bitmap. This
> patch won't work by itself, will it? I think you need to merge it with
> the succeeding patches.

Yeah.  I originally wrote as you suggested, but I needed to skip 0x03 because of 
the reason written below.

> +/* Use DIRTY_FLAG as indexes of bit-based phys_ram_dirty.
> +   0x03 is empty to make it compatible with byte-based bitmap. */
> +#define MASTER_DIRTY_FLAG    0x00
>  #define VGA_DIRTY_FLAG       0x01
>  #define CODE_DIRTY_FLAG      0x02
> -#define MIGRATION_DIRTY_FLAG 0x08
> +#define MIGRATION_DIRTY_FLAG 0x04

If you think if (i != 0x03) is better, I would modify it to a loop.

And sorry, you need to merge the succeeding patches to make it work.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-12  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-06  0:51 [PATCH v2 0/6] Introduce bit-based phys_ram_dirty, and bit-based dirty page checker Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-06  0:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-06  0:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] Modify DIRTY_FLAG value to use as indexes of bit-based phys_ram_dirty Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-06  0:51   ` [Qemu-devel] " Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-06  0:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] Introduce bit-based phys_ram_dirty for VGA, CODE, MIGRATION and MASTER Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-06  0:51   ` [Qemu-devel] " Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-12  8:01   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-12  8:01     ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-04-12  9:39     ` Yoshiaki Tamura [this message]
2010-04-12  9:39       ` Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-12 10:17       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-12 10:17         ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-04-06  0:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] Modifies wrapper functions for byte-based phys_ram_dirty bitmap to bit-based phys_ram_dirty bitmap Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-06  0:51   ` [Qemu-devel] " Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-12  8:10   ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-12  8:10     ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-04-12 10:58     ` Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-12 10:58       ` [Qemu-devel] " Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-12 11:09       ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-12 11:09         ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-04-13  8:01         ` Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-13  8:01           ` [Qemu-devel] " Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-13  9:20           ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-13  9:20             ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-04-13 10:49             ` Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-13 10:49               ` [Qemu-devel] " Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-06  0:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] Introduce cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty_range() Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-06  0:51   ` [Qemu-devel] " Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-06  0:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] Use cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range() to update phys_ram_dirty Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-06  0:51   ` [Qemu-devel] " Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-06  0:51 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] Use cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty_range() to check multiple dirty pages Yoshiaki Tamura
2010-04-06  0:51   ` [Qemu-devel] " Yoshiaki Tamura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BC2EA64.6060700@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --to=tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.