From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
oerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>,
zhiteng.huang@intel.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] perf & kvm: Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:57:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC5919E.1010400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004141743.32393.sheng@linux.intel.com>
On 04/14/2010 12:43 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 April 2010 17:20:15 Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 04/14/2030 12:05 PM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the new patch of V3 against tip/master of April 13th
>>> if anyone wants to try it.
>>>
>> Thanks for persisting despite the flames.
>>
>> Can you please separate arch/x86/kvm part of the patch? That will make
>> for easier reviewing, and will need to go through separate trees.
>>
>> Sheng, did you make any progress with the NMI injection issue?
>>
> Yes, though some other works interrupt me lately...
>
> The very first version has issue due to SELF_IPI mode can't be used to send
> NMI according to SDM. That's the reason why x2apic don't have way to do this.
>
Yes, I see that now. Looks like others have the same questions...
> But later I found another issue of fail to inspect inside the guest. I think
> it's due to NMI is asynchronous event, though it should be triggered very
> quickly, you can't guarantee that the handler would be triggered before the
> state(current_vcpu) is cleared with current code.
>
> Maybe just extended the "guest state" region would be fine, if the latency is
> stable enough(though I think it maybe platform depended). I am working on this
> now.
>
I wouldn't like to depend on model specific behaviour.
One option is to read all the information synchronously and store it in
a per-cpu area with atomic instructions, then queue the NMI. Another
option is to have another callback which tells us that the NMI is done,
and have a busy loop wait until the NMI is delivered.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-14 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-14 9:06 [PATCH V3] perf & kvm: Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side Zhang, Yanmin
2030-04-14 9:05 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-04-14 9:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-14 9:43 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-14 9:57 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-04-14 10:14 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-14 10:19 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-14 10:27 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-14 10:33 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-14 10:36 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-14 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-14 11:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-15 1:05 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2030-04-15 1:04 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-04-15 8:05 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-15 8:58 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2030-04-15 8:57 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-04-15 9:04 ` oerg Roedel
2010-04-15 9:09 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-15 9:44 ` oerg Roedel
2010-04-15 9:48 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-15 10:40 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-15 10:44 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-15 14:08 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-15 14:08 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-17 18:12 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-19 8:25 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-20 3:32 ` Sheng Yang
2010-04-20 9:38 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-27 19:03 ` [PATCH] Psychovisually-optimized HZ setting (2.6.33.3) Uwaysi Bin Kareem
2010-04-27 19:51 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-04-27 21:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-04-15 8:58 ` [PATCH V3] perf & kvm: Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side Zhang, Yanmin
2010-04-15 1:05 ` Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BC5919E.1010400@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
--cc=zhiteng.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.