All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: Alexis Berlemont <berlemont.hauw@domain.hid>,
	xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [git pull] RTDM fixes and reworks
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:38:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC85A28.30006@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BC859AC.1090206@domain.hid>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> The following changes since commit 113ea4d56e8b215cb56ae7673013163ea5a5987d:
>>>>>   Gilles Chanteperdrix (1):
>>>>>         switchtest: increase stack sizes
>>>>>
>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>
>>>>>   git://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-jki.git for-upstream
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the first of likely three rounds of patches for 2.5.x. It mostly
>>>>> deals with introducing rtdm_rt_capable to replace the
>>>>> __xn_exec_conforming marks of RTDM syscalls and with deprecating RT
>>>>> open/socket/close for RTDM devices. The latter affects quite a few
>>>>> devices in our tree, so I'm CC'ing the maintainers to check if they see
>>>>> any problems in dropping RT creation/closure at this point.
>>>>>
>>>>> Besides some smaller fixes and an irqbench refactoring, this series also
>>>>> contains a solution for the confusions about incompatible rttest<n>
>>>>> devices. It simply avoids collisions be using different device names for
>>>>> the different device subclasses.
>>>> switchtest already used another solution for that problem: the different
>>>> devices use different ioctls. So, IMO we already had a solution for that
>>>> issue.
>>> Look at the diffstat of switchtest. I wanted to fix the issue for the
>>> rest without replicating code.
>> I would agree with you for patches in xenomai-head. But in that case,
>> this is an ABI breakage.
> 
> It's internal testing stuff.
> 
> If you think anyone out there may have written his own back- or
> front-end, I could make all test devices additionally register under the
> old rttest<n> as well. I just don't think it's worth the effort.

No, the point is anyone out there with a 2.5.0 user-space Xenomai should
be able to run it with Xenomai 2.5.3. So, there should be at least a
Kconfig option to keep the old names.


-- 
					    Gilles.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-16 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-16 11:24 [Xenomai-core] [git pull] RTDM fixes and reworks Jan Kiszka
2010-04-16 12:24 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-04-16 12:26   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-04-16 12:31     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-04-16 12:35       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-04-16 12:38         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix [this message]
2010-04-16 12:50           ` Jan Kiszka
2010-04-16 13:07             ` Gilles Chanteperdrix

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BC85A28.30006@domain.hid \
    --to=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
    --cc=berlemont.hauw@domain.hid \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.