Re: [PATCH 2/2] ibft: For UEFI machines actually do scan ACPI for iBFT.

[Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>]

On 04/21/2010 04:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri,  9 Apr 2010 14:21:28 +0000
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@kernel.org>  wrote:
>
>> For machines with IBFT 1.03 do scan the ACPI table for 'iBFT'
>> or for 'IBFT'. If the machine is in UEFI mode, only do the ACPI
>> table scan. For all other machines (pre IBFT 1.03) do
>> a memory scan if not found in the ACPI tables.
>>
>> Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@kernel.org>
>
> The Author: line is unneeded and inappropriate here.  That's what the
> From: line does.
>
>> Acked-by: Peter Jones<pjones@redhat.com>
>> Tested-by: Mike Christie<michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk<konrad@kernel.org>
>
> Your covering email indicates that Mike and Peter wrote the patches,
> but neither of the patches have their signoffs.  Can we please sort all
> this out?
>

I did a small fix to 
ibft-update-ibft-handling-for-v103-of-the-spec.patch to get it to 
compile. It looks like that patch has a "Reviewed-by: Mike Christie 
<michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>". Feel free to change that to a Signed-off-by: 
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu> if needed.

I did not do any changes to 
ibft-for-uefi-machines-actually-do-scan-acpi-for-ibft.patch.

I tested both patches.