All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>,
	Alexandros Batsakis <batsakis@netapp.com>,
	Ricardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] nfs: fix some issues in nfs41_proc_reclaim_complete()
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:21:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD04D66.80809@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100422092839.GI29647@bicker>

On Apr. 22, 2010, 12:28 +0300, Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> wrote:
> The original code passed an ERR_PTR() to rpc_put_task() and instead of
> returning zero on success it returned -ENOMEM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> ---
> This was found by smatch and I've only compile tested it.  Sorry.  :/
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index 6380670..071fced 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -5218,9 +5218,12 @@ static int nfs41_proc_reclaim_complete(struct nfs_client *clp)
>  	msg.rpc_resp = &calldata->res;
>  	task_setup_data.callback_data = calldata;
>  	task = rpc_run_task(&task_setup_data);
> -	if (IS_ERR(task))
> +	if (IS_ERR(task)) {
>  		status = PTR_ERR(task);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>  	rpc_put_task(task);
> +	return 0;
>  out:
>  	dprintk("<-- %s status=%d\n", __func__, status);
>  	return status;

Dan, thanks for sending the fix.
For the sake of dprintk, how about doing this instead:

git diff --stat -p -M
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 6380670..8671f7a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5204,12 +5204,14 @@ static int nfs41_proc_reclaim_complete(struct nfs_client *clp)
 		.callback_ops = &nfs4_reclaim_complete_call_ops,
 		.flags = RPC_TASK_ASYNC,
 	};
-	int status = -ENOMEM;
+	int status;
 
 	dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
 	calldata = kzalloc(sizeof(*calldata), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (calldata = NULL)
+	if (calldata = NULL) {
+		status = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
+	}
 	calldata->clp = clp;
 	calldata->arg.one_fs = 0;
 	calldata->res.seq_res.sr_slotid = NFS4_MAX_SLOT_TABLE;
@@ -5218,9 +5220,12 @@ static int nfs41_proc_reclaim_complete(struct nfs_client *clp)
 	msg.rpc_resp = &calldata->res;
 	task_setup_data.callback_data = calldata;
 	task = rpc_run_task(&task_setup_data);
-	if (IS_ERR(task))
+	if (IS_ERR(task)) {
 		status = PTR_ERR(task);
+		goto out;
+	}
 	rpc_put_task(task);
+	status = 0;
 out:
 	dprintk("<-- %s status=%d\n", __func__, status);
 	return status;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>,
	Alexandros Batsakis <batsakis@netapp.com>,
	Ricardo Labiaga <Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] nfs: fix some issues in nfs41_proc_reclaim_complete()
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:21:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD04D66.80809@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100422092839.GI29647@bicker>

On Apr. 22, 2010, 12:28 +0300, Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> wrote:
> The original code passed an ERR_PTR() to rpc_put_task() and instead of
> returning zero on success it returned -ENOMEM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> ---
> This was found by smatch and I've only compile tested it.  Sorry.  :/
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index 6380670..071fced 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -5218,9 +5218,12 @@ static int nfs41_proc_reclaim_complete(struct nfs_client *clp)
>  	msg.rpc_resp = &calldata->res;
>  	task_setup_data.callback_data = calldata;
>  	task = rpc_run_task(&task_setup_data);
> -	if (IS_ERR(task))
> +	if (IS_ERR(task)) {
>  		status = PTR_ERR(task);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>  	rpc_put_task(task);
> +	return 0;
>  out:
>  	dprintk("<-- %s status=%d\n", __func__, status);
>  	return status;

Dan, thanks for sending the fix.
For the sake of dprintk, how about doing this instead:

git diff --stat -p -M
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 6380670..8671f7a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5204,12 +5204,14 @@ static int nfs41_proc_reclaim_complete(struct nfs_client *clp)
 		.callback_ops = &nfs4_reclaim_complete_call_ops,
 		.flags = RPC_TASK_ASYNC,
 	};
-	int status = -ENOMEM;
+	int status;
 
 	dprintk("--> %s\n", __func__);
 	calldata = kzalloc(sizeof(*calldata), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (calldata == NULL)
+	if (calldata == NULL) {
+		status = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
+	}
 	calldata->clp = clp;
 	calldata->arg.one_fs = 0;
 	calldata->res.seq_res.sr_slotid = NFS4_MAX_SLOT_TABLE;
@@ -5218,9 +5220,12 @@ static int nfs41_proc_reclaim_complete(struct nfs_client *clp)
 	msg.rpc_resp = &calldata->res;
 	task_setup_data.callback_data = calldata;
 	task = rpc_run_task(&task_setup_data);
-	if (IS_ERR(task))
+	if (IS_ERR(task)) {
 		status = PTR_ERR(task);
+		goto out;
+	}
 	rpc_put_task(task);
+	status = 0;
 out:
 	dprintk("<-- %s status=%d\n", __func__, status);
 	return status;

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-22 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-22  9:28 [patch] nfs: fix some issues in nfs41_proc_reclaim_complete() Dan Carpenter
2010-04-22  9:28 ` Dan Carpenter
2010-04-22 13:21 ` Benny Halevy [this message]
2010-04-22 13:21   ` Benny Halevy
2010-04-22 19:38   ` Dan Carpenter
2010-04-22 19:38     ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BD04D66.80809@panasas.com \
    --to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=Ricardo.Labiaga@netapp.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=andros@netapp.com \
    --cc=batsakis@netapp.com \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.