From: Florian Kusche <flox@kusche.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Questions about 4k sector drives
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:45:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD42B57.9000703@kusche.de> (raw)
Hello,
I have a few questions about Software RAID and 4k-sector drives. I already searched the web, but some questions are left.
1) (this one is not directly raid-related)
I understand, that newer kernels can determine whether a drive uses 4k physical sectors even if it presents 512-byte logical sectors to the outside. (via the sector_size_supported() patch by Matthew Wilcox)
Is this only an information given to userland tools, or will the linux kernel change its behavior (e.g. use 4k-blocks for such block devices)? (I guess it's only an information for userland tools.)
2)
Will Software RAID work with physical 4k-sector drives...
- that simulate logical 512 byte sectors?
- that also have logical 4k-sectors?
(I'm pretty sure, the answer to both questions is yes.)
3)
Will Software RAID work in mixed setups? i.e.: what combinations of the following drive types are possible?
- 512b physical / 512b logical
- 4k physical / 512b logical
- 4k physical / 4k logical
And: Will the resulting md block device have 512 byte blocks or 4k blocks?
(I would guess that you need to have the same logical sector size for all disks.)
I am aware of the performance problems due to read-modify-write cycles and potential misalignment. This has been discussed in plenty of articles on the web.
It would be great if someone could clear things up a little (and tell me if me guesses are correct).
Thanks,
Florian
next reply other threads:[~2010-04-25 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-25 11:45 Florian Kusche [this message]
2010-04-25 14:43 ` Questions about 4k sector drives Phillip Susi
2010-05-02 23:04 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-05-03 5:54 ` Luca Berra
2010-05-03 13:17 ` Phillip Susi
2010-05-03 13:30 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-05-03 13:38 ` Phillip Susi
2010-05-03 20:27 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-05-04 13:24 ` Phillip Susi
2010-05-04 15:29 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-05-05 7:44 ` John Robinson
2010-05-05 7:47 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-05-10 17:13 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-05-03 20:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BD42B57.9000703@kusche.de \
--to=flox@kusche.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.