From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
Cc: Florian Kusche <flox@kusche.de>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Questions about 4k sector drives
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 19:04:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BDE0512.8070502@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272206601.7734.4.camel@faldara>
Phillip Susi wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 13:45 +0200, Florian Kusche wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a few questions about Software RAID and 4k-sector drives. I
>> already searched the web, but some questions are left.
>>
>> 1) (this one is not directly raid-related) I understand, that newer
>> kernels can determine whether a drive uses 4k physical sectors even if
>> it presents 512-byte logical sectors to the outside. (via the
>> sector_size_supported() patch by Matthew Wilcox)
>>
>> Is this only an information given to userland tools, or will the linux
>> kernel change its behavior (e.g. use 4k-blocks for such block
>> devices)? (I guess it's only an information for userland tools.)
>>
>
> If the device reports it, then the kernel knows it and exports it to
> user space. The new 4k drives from WD unfortunately, lie and report
> their physical sector size is 512 bytes.
>
>
>> 2)
>> Will Software RAID work with physical 4k-sector drives...
>> - that simulate logical 512 byte sectors?
>> - that also have logical 4k-sectors?
>> (I'm pretty sure, the answer to both questions is yes.)
>>
>
> Yes.
>
Is there any reason not to just align partitions for all drives on 32kB
sectors and expect that to work on 512b 4kB and SSD? Cautious testing
here says it works fine, no anomalies, no exciting performance data,
just works.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"We can't solve today's problems by using the same thinking we
used in creating them." - Einstein
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-02 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-25 11:45 Questions about 4k sector drives Florian Kusche
2010-04-25 14:43 ` Phillip Susi
2010-05-02 23:04 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2010-05-03 5:54 ` Luca Berra
2010-05-03 13:17 ` Phillip Susi
2010-05-03 13:30 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-05-03 13:38 ` Phillip Susi
2010-05-03 20:27 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-05-04 13:24 ` Phillip Susi
2010-05-04 15:29 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-05-05 7:44 ` John Robinson
2010-05-05 7:47 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-05-10 17:13 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-05-03 20:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BDE0512.8070502@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=flox@kusche.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.