From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: "ravi.anand" <ravi.anand@qlogic.com>,
Vikas Chaudhary <vikas.chaudhary@qlogic.com>,
Linux-SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Karen Higgins <karen.higgins@qlogic.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] qla4xxx: Added support for ISP82XX
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:45:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD8E4CF.1030501@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272497102.14756.46.camel@mulgrave.site>
On 04/28/2010 06:25 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>> Are you going to pull in all the other patches except this one ?
>> We can resubmit this one once Mike get a chance to review it.
>
> Um, so I understood the comment to mean that Mike is still waiting for
> you to comment on his questions and sugestions for patches 9,8,6,1 of
> the original 12 patch series from 6 April ... unless I missed them?
>
They sent me mails offlist for my review comments. The reworked patches
they are sending in this patcheset are a result of that work, so all the
patches but "[PATCH 09/11] qla4xxx: Added support for ISP82XX" are ok.
It might be ok, but I have not looked at it in depth. I was trying to
say before that I have not looked at it because we had been working on
the other patches.
> As long as this 11 patch series reviews and applies independently, I'm
> fine with dropping this and taking the rest.
They should. I applied all but the 9/11 one, built them and ran them ok.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-29 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-28 6:14 [PATCH 09/11] qla4xxx: Added support for ISP82XX Vikas Chaudhary
2010-04-28 6:37 ` Mike Christie
[not found] ` <B065E21A-3DB2-4303-B0DC-FB41F97F0225@qlogic.com>
2010-04-28 23:25 ` James Bottomley
2010-04-29 1:45 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2010-04-29 6:17 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2010-05-28 6:22 ` Mike Christie
2010-06-11 8:44 ` Vikas Chaudhary
2010-06-12 0:39 ` Mike Christie
2010-06-12 9:56 ` Ravi Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BD8E4CF.1030501@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=karen.higgins@qlogic.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=ravi.anand@qlogic.com \
--cc=vikas.chaudhary@qlogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.