Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] nucleus: Plug race between rpi_clear_remote and rpi_next

[Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 965 bytes --]

Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 19:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> Don't you think that, quoting yourself:
>>>
>>> "I have to confess, I do not understand how the patch may relate to our
>>> crash. But that's because I still only have a semi-understanding of this
>>> frightening complex RPI code"
>>>
>>> does not fit that well with any kind of strong assertion made later on
>>> the same topic, not backed by facts?
>> See, as long as you do not directly explain why my concerns on this
>> naturally racy construct were not valid (I brought up quite a few
>> concrete questions),
> 
> Which were answered. And you seem to consider that a construct is racy
> by design without taking care of understanding why they could be
> perfectly valid in the proper context. This is what I was pointing out,
> all time long.

Depends on the POV. But what counts is the outcome of this, and that's a
fix.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]