From: Takahiro Yasui <tyasui@redhat.com>
To: lvm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] handle transient errors in lvconvert --repair
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 16:35:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BF44B89.2070309@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zkzv3aqq.fsf@twilight.int.mornfall.net.>
On 05/19/10 16:19, Petr Rockai wrote:
> Takahiro Yasui <tyasui@redhat.com> writes:
>
>>> +++ cvs-upstream/tools/lvconvert.c 2010-05-19 20:18:40.000000000 +0200
>>> @@ -1225,11 +1225,11 @@
>>> if (!lv_remove_mirrors(cmd, lv, failed_mirrors, new_log_count,
>>> _is_partial_lv, NULL, 0))
>>> return 0;
>>
>> As I posted in the previous mail, the argument, new_log_count, is
>> correct here? The argument is used to check if a log should be removed.
>> I think that failed_log comes here instead of new_log_count.
...
> ... now this was probably not being noticed, since in most cases, the
> mistakenly removed log would be re-created right away by later
> code. I'll fix this in my local patch.
Yeah, that valuable name is very confusing. :-<
Anyway thanks to fixing this.
>> Or the value such as nlc in _lvconvert_mirrors_aux() comes.
>>
>> uint32_t nlc = (!new_log_count || lp->mirrors == 1) ? 1U : 0U;
>> ...
>> } else if (!lv_remove_mirrors(cmd, lv, nmc, nlc,
>> is_mirror_image_removable, operable_pvs, 0))
>
> Ugh, nlc sounds like short for new_log_count to me, which is *extremely
> confusing*, since it's actually quite opposite: nlc = 1 means remove
> log, nlc = 0 means retain the log. Is that right?
Yes, it is. It is similarly used as the previous parameter, nmc.
nmc tells the number of mirrors which will be removed. So as for
nlc, it is easier to think nlc the log number which should be removed.
(0: not removed, 1: removed)
Thanks,
Taka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-19 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-27 15:14 [PATCH] handle transient errors in lvconvert --repair Petr Rockai
2010-04-27 18:03 ` Petr Rockai
2010-05-06 17:30 ` Petr Rockai
2010-05-14 22:52 ` Takahiro Yasui
2010-05-17 23:01 ` Takahiro Yasui
2010-05-19 12:06 ` Petr Rockai
2010-05-19 15:06 ` Takahiro Yasui
2010-05-19 18:31 ` Petr Rockai
2010-05-19 19:46 ` Takahiro Yasui
2010-05-19 20:19 ` Petr Rockai
2010-05-19 20:31 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2010-05-19 20:35 ` Takahiro Yasui [this message]
2010-05-20 0:49 ` Takahiro Yasui
2010-05-20 7:40 ` Petr Rockai
2010-05-20 11:54 ` Takahiro Yasui
2010-05-19 16:44 ` Takahiro Yasui
2010-05-19 17:15 ` Takahiro Yasui
2010-05-19 20:26 ` Petr Rockai
2010-04-28 19:37 ` Takahiro Yasui
2010-05-05 7:46 ` Petr Rockai
2010-05-05 15:31 ` Takahiro Yasui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BF44B89.2070309@redhat.com \
--to=tyasui@redhat.com \
--cc=lvm-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.