From: "Linda A. Walsh" <lvm@tlinx.org>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: [linux-lvm] Volume alignment over RAID
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 14:24:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BF5A883.7060503@tlinx.org> (raw)
I'm a bit unclear as to where some units are applied in my RAID setup, but
was wondering how LVM interacted, could be, or should be setup so that
created volumes would be aligned properly on top of a RAID disk.
I'm using a RAID 'chunk' size of 64k as suggested by the RAID documentation
and am using 6 disks to create a RAID6, giving 4 units of data/stripe. Does
this mean my logical volume needs to be aligned on a 64K boundary, or a 256k
boundary? I.e. does 64k usually specify chunk/unit, or chunk/stripe?
What do I need to do to make sure my logical volumes always line up on RAID
stripe boundaries?
I've been using default logical volume parameters, which I think use an
allocation size measured in Megabytes, so does that imply I'm automatically
aligned (as 64k and 256k both divide into 1 Meg)? Or is some offset
involved?
Thanks! Linda Walsh
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-20 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-20 21:24 Linda A. Walsh [this message]
2010-05-21 5:10 ` [linux-lvm] Volume alignment over RAID Luca Berra
2010-05-21 6:48 ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-05-21 7:19 ` Lyn Rees
2010-05-21 18:50 ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-05-22 7:36 ` Luca Berra
2010-05-22 7:23 ` Luca Berra
2010-05-27 16:40 ` Doug Ledford
2010-06-21 4:26 ` [linux-lvm] RAID chunk size & LVM 'offset' affecting RAID stripe alignment Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-23 18:59 ` Doug Ledford
2010-06-25 8:36 ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-26 1:50 ` Doug Ledford
2010-06-28 18:56 ` Charles Marcus
2010-06-29 21:33 ` Linda A. Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BF5A883.7060503@tlinx.org \
--to=lvm@tlinx.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.