From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Volume alignment over RAID
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 12:40:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFEA099.9020005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100522072321.GB12294@maude.comedia.it>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1569 bytes --]
On 05/22/2010 03:23 AM, Luca Berra wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:48:31PM -0700, Linda A. Walsh wrote:
>> Luca Berra wrote:
>>>> I'm using a RAID 'chunk' size of 64k as suggested by the RAID
>>>> documentation
>>>> and am using 6 disks to create a RAID6, giving 4 units of
>>>> data/stripe. Does
>>> I suppose by raid you mean md, so i wonder what documentation you were
>>> looking at?
>> ---
>> Well, doc in 2 different raid controllers LSI and rocket raid both
>> suggest 64K as a unit size (forget, their exact term).
Hardware raid and software raid are two entirely different things when
it comes to optimization.
>>> I think 64k might be small as a chunk size, depending on your array size
>>> you probably want a bigger size.
>> ---
>> Really? What are the trade offs? Array size well 6 disks and 4
>> of data.
> ok, i trew the stone ..
> First we have to consider usage scenarios, i.e. average read and average
> write size, large reads benefit from larger chunks, small writes with
> too large chunks would still result on whole stripe Read-Modify-Write.
>
> there were people on linux-raid ml doing benchmarks, and iirc using
> chunks between 256k and 1m gave better average results
That was me. The best results are with 256 or 512k chunk sizes. Above
512k you don't get any more benefit.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-20 21:24 [linux-lvm] Volume alignment over RAID Linda A. Walsh
2010-05-21 5:10 ` Luca Berra
2010-05-21 6:48 ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-05-21 7:19 ` Lyn Rees
2010-05-21 18:50 ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-05-22 7:36 ` Luca Berra
2010-05-22 7:23 ` Luca Berra
2010-05-27 16:40 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2010-06-21 4:26 ` [linux-lvm] RAID chunk size & LVM 'offset' affecting RAID stripe alignment Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-23 18:59 ` Doug Ledford
2010-06-25 8:36 ` Linda A. Walsh
2010-06-26 1:50 ` Doug Ledford
2010-06-28 18:56 ` Charles Marcus
2010-06-29 21:33 ` Linda A. Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BFEA099.9020005@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.