From: minskey guo <chaohong_guo@linux.intel.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, prarit@redhat.com, andi.kleen@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
minskey guo <chaohong.guo@intel.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] online CPU before memory failed in pcpu_alloc_pages()
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:22:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BF642BB.2020402@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100521134424.45e0ee36.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>>> --- a/mm/percpu.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
>>>> @@ -714,13 +714,29 @@ static int pcpu_alloc_pages(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
>>>
>>> In linux-next, Tejun has gone and moved pcpu_alloc_pages() into the new
>>> mm/percpu-vm.c. So either
>>
>> This has gone into Linus' tree today ...
>>
>
> Hmm, a comment here.
>
> Recently, Lee Schermerhorn developed
>
> numa-introduce-numa_mem_id-effective-local-memory-node-id-fix2.patch
>
> Then, you can use cpu_to_mem() instead of cpu_to_node() to find the
> nearest available node.
> I don't check cpu_to_mem() is synchronized with NUMA hotplug but
> using cpu_to_mem() rather than adding
> =
>
> + if ((nid == -1) ||
> + !(node_zonelist(nid, GFP_KERNEL)->_zonerefs->zone))
> + nid = numa_node_id();
> +
> ==
>
> is better.
Yes. I can use cpu_to_mem(). only some little difference during
CPU online: 1st cpu within memoryless node gets memory from current
node or the node to which the cpu0 belongs,
But I have a question about the patch:
numa-slab-use-numa_mem_id-for-slab-local-memory-node.patch,
@@ -2968,9 +2991,23 @@ static int __build_all_zonelists(void *d
...
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
setup_pageset(&per_cpu(boot_pageset, cpu), 0);
...
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
+ if (cpu_online(cpu))
+ cpu_to_mem(cpu) = local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(cpu));
+#endif
Look at the last two lines, suppose that memory is onlined before CPUs,
where will cpu_to_mem(cpu) be set to the right nodeid for the last
onlined cpu ? Does that CPU always get memory from the node including
cpu0 for slab allocator where cpu_to_mem() is used ?
thanks,
-minskey
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: minskey guo <chaohong_guo@linux.intel.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, prarit@redhat.com, andi.kleen@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
minskey guo <chaohong.guo@intel.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] online CPU before memory failed in pcpu_alloc_pages()
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:22:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BF642BB.2020402@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100521134424.45e0ee36.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>>> --- a/mm/percpu.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
>>>> @@ -714,13 +714,29 @@ static int pcpu_alloc_pages(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
>>>
>>> In linux-next, Tejun has gone and moved pcpu_alloc_pages() into the new
>>> mm/percpu-vm.c. So either
>>
>> This has gone into Linus' tree today ...
>>
>
> Hmm, a comment here.
>
> Recently, Lee Schermerhorn developed
>
> numa-introduce-numa_mem_id-effective-local-memory-node-id-fix2.patch
>
> Then, you can use cpu_to_mem() instead of cpu_to_node() to find the
> nearest available node.
> I don't check cpu_to_mem() is synchronized with NUMA hotplug but
> using cpu_to_mem() rather than adding
> =
>
> + if ((nid == -1) ||
> + !(node_zonelist(nid, GFP_KERNEL)->_zonerefs->zone))
> + nid = numa_node_id();
> +
> ==
>
> is better.
Yes. I can use cpu_to_mem(). only some little difference during
CPU online: 1st cpu within memoryless node gets memory from current
node or the node to which the cpu0 belongs,
But I have a question about the patch:
numa-slab-use-numa_mem_id-for-slab-local-memory-node.patch,
@@ -2968,9 +2991,23 @@ static int __build_all_zonelists(void *d
...
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
setup_pageset(&per_cpu(boot_pageset, cpu), 0);
...
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
+ if (cpu_online(cpu))
+ cpu_to_mem(cpu) = local_memory_node(cpu_to_node(cpu));
+#endif
Look at the last two lines, suppose that memory is onlined before CPUs,
where will cpu_to_mem(cpu) be set to the right nodeid for the last
onlined cpu ? Does that CPU always get memory from the node including
cpu0 for slab allocator where cpu_to_mem() is used ?
thanks,
-minskey
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-21 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-18 6:17 [PATCH] online CPU before memory failed in pcpu_alloc_pages() minskey guo
2010-05-18 6:17 ` minskey guo
2010-05-20 20:43 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-20 20:43 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-21 0:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-21 4:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-21 4:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-21 8:22 ` minskey guo [this message]
2010-05-21 8:22 ` minskey guo
2010-05-21 8:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-21 8:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-05-21 9:12 ` minskey guo
2010-05-21 9:12 ` minskey guo
2010-05-21 13:21 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-21 13:21 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-24 1:03 ` Guo, Chaohong
2010-05-24 1:03 ` Guo, Chaohong
2010-05-24 14:59 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-24 14:59 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-25 1:35 ` Guo, Chaohong
2010-05-25 1:35 ` Guo, Chaohong
2010-05-21 12:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-21 12:32 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-05-21 4:05 ` Guo, Chaohong
2010-05-21 4:05 ` Guo, Chaohong
2010-05-21 7:29 ` Kleen, Andi
2010-05-21 7:29 ` Kleen, Andi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BF642BB.2020402@linux.intel.com \
--to=chaohong_guo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
--cc=chaohong.guo@intel.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.