From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Brian Bloniarz <bmb@athenacr.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
chris.mason@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Export tsc related information in sysfs
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:07:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFB14BE.8070407@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bcb35f6d-e632-4fb6-bef0-8c55335ef537@default>
On 05/24/2010 05:01 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> On a quick sample of two machines looking at the TSC calibration
> done by Xen (which exposes the equivalent of tsc_khz), it appears
> that the stamped value is different from the calibration by about
> 1000ppm. YMMV.
So pretty seriously different. Less than I would have expected, but not
out of the ballpark.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-25 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-20 19:19 [PATCH] x86: Export tsc related information in sysfs Brian Bloniarz
2010-05-22 2:03 ` john stultz
2010-05-22 3:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-24 18:13 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-24 18:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-24 18:51 ` john stultz
2010-05-24 20:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-24 20:39 ` john stultz
2010-05-24 21:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-24 22:04 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-24 22:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-24 22:49 ` john stultz
2010-05-24 23:16 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-24 23:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-24 23:30 ` john stultz
2010-05-24 23:42 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-25 0:01 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-25 0:07 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-05-25 1:33 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-05-26 0:16 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-05-26 0:48 ` john stultz
2010-05-26 2:50 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-05-26 12:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-26 14:26 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-26 14:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-26 15:04 ` john stultz
2010-05-26 16:02 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-05-26 16:25 ` john stultz
2010-05-26 18:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-26 18:44 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-05-26 18:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-26 20:19 ` john stultz
2010-05-26 21:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-26 19:49 ` john stultz
2010-05-26 20:22 ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-05-26 12:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-15 1:40 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-05-15 9:57 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-15 13:29 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-15 16:48 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-05-15 19:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-05-15 22:32 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-16 5:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-05-16 9:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-16 16:42 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-16 19:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-17 1:31 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-17 5:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-05-18 9:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-18 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-18 11:25 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-18 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-18 15:13 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-18 16:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-18 17:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 17:49 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-18 18:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 19:00 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-18 19:16 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-18 19:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 20:29 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-18 20:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-18 21:02 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-18 21:13 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-19 6:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-17 10:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-16 20:29 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-05-17 10:26 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-04 14:24 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-15 22:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-17 10:22 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-17 15:23 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-17 16:56 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-17 22:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-17 23:33 ` Dan Magenheimer
2010-05-18 0:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-18 0:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-15 12:35 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2010-05-15 14:37 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BFB14BE.8070407@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bmb@athenacr.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.