* [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame @ 2010-05-26 7:04 ` Justin P. Mattock 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-05-26 7:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel This is new: [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL! I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned? Justin P. Mattock ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame @ 2010-05-26 7:04 ` Justin P. Mattock 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-05-26 7:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel; +Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez, Linux Kernel Mailing List This is new: [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL! I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned? Justin P. Mattock ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame 2010-05-26 7:04 ` Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-05-26 16:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-05-26 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: > This is new: > [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last > frame > [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL! > > I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned? No, the print can be changed to say "reseting hardware", patch welcomed. Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame @ 2010-05-26 16:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-05-26 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Justin P. Mattock; +Cc: ath9k-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: > This is new: > [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last > frame > [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL! > > I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned? No, the print can be changed to say "reseting hardware", patch welcomed. Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame 2010-05-26 16:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-05-26 16:35 ` Justin P. Mattock -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-05-26 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel On 05/26/2010 09:33 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Justin P. Mattock > <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This is new: >> [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last >> frame >> [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL! >> >> I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned? >> > No, the print can be changed to say "reseting hardware", patch welcomed. > > Luis > > sure!! let me fix that up, and also send you something else I had kicking around.. Justin P. Mattock ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame @ 2010-05-26 16:35 ` Justin P. Mattock 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-05-26 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Luis R. Rodriguez; +Cc: ath9k-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List On 05/26/2010 09:33 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Justin P. Mattock > <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This is new: >> [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last >> frame >> [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL! >> >> I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned? >> > No, the print can be changed to say "reseting hardware", patch welcomed. > > Luis > > sure!! let me fix that up, and also send you something else I had kicking around.. Justin P. Mattock ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame 2010-05-26 16:35 ` Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-05-26 16:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-05-26 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: > On 05/26/2010 09:33 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Justin P. Mattock >> <justinmattock@gmail.com> ?wrote: >> >>> >>> This is new: >>> [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last >>> frame >>> [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL! >>> >>> I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned? >>> >> >> No, the print can be changed to say "reseting hardware", patch welcomed. >> >> ? Luis >> >> > > sure!! let me fix that up, and also send you something > else I had kicking around.. Sure, BTW, no need to use lkml unless you need further review, use instead just linux-wireless for patches/raves/rants for 802.11. In fact you can drop ath9k-devel when using linux-wireless. Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame @ 2010-05-26 16:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-05-26 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Justin P. Mattock; +Cc: ath9k-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: > On 05/26/2010 09:33 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Justin P. Mattock >> <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> This is new: >>> [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last >>> frame >>> [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL! >>> >>> I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned? >>> >> >> No, the print can be changed to say "reseting hardware", patch welcomed. >> >> Luis >> >> > > sure!! let me fix that up, and also send you something > else I had kicking around.. Sure, BTW, no need to use lkml unless you need further review, use instead just linux-wireless for patches/raves/rants for 802.11. In fact you can drop ath9k-devel when using linux-wireless. Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame 2010-05-26 16:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2010-05-26 16:51 ` Justin P. Mattock -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-05-26 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel On 05/26/2010 09:40 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Justin P. Mattock > <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 05/26/2010 09:33 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Justin P. Mattock >>> <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> This is new: >>>> [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last >>>> frame >>>> [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL! >>>> >>>> I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned? >>>> >>>> >>> No, the print can be changed to say "reseting hardware", patch welcomed. >>> >>> Luis >>> >>> >>> >> sure!! let me fix that up, and also send you something >> else I had kicking around.. >> > Sure, BTW, no need to use lkml unless you need further review, use > instead just linux-wireless for patches/raves/rants for 802.11. In > fact you can drop ath9k-devel when using linux-wireless. > > Luis > > alright!! (and of course after pressing "send" I get this post!!) Anyways I'll send another patch that I was experimenting with(just to see!!). cheers, Justin P. Mattock ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame @ 2010-05-26 16:51 ` Justin P. Mattock 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Justin P. Mattock @ 2010-05-26 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Luis R. Rodriguez; +Cc: ath9k-devel, Linux Kernel Mailing List On 05/26/2010 09:40 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Justin P. Mattock > <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 05/26/2010 09:33 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Justin P. Mattock >>> <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> This is new: >>>> [ 8660.899624] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last >>>> frame >>>> [ 8660.899676] ath: Unable to stop TxDMA. Reset HAL! >>>> >>>> I don't have hal installed!! should I be concerned? >>>> >>>> >>> No, the print can be changed to say "reseting hardware", patch welcomed. >>> >>> Luis >>> >>> >>> >> sure!! let me fix that up, and also send you something >> else I had kicking around.. >> > Sure, BTW, no need to use lkml unless you need further review, use > instead just linux-wireless for patches/raves/rants for 802.11. In > fact you can drop ath9k-devel when using linux-wireless. > > Luis > > alright!! (and of course after pressing "send" I get this post!!) Anyways I'll send another patch that I was experimenting with(just to see!!). cheers, Justin P. Mattock ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-26 16:51 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-05-26 7:04 [ath9k-devel] ath: Failed to stop TX DMA in 100 msec after killing last frame Justin P. Mattock 2010-05-26 7:04 ` Justin P. Mattock 2010-05-26 16:33 ` [ath9k-devel] " Luis R. Rodriguez 2010-05-26 16:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2010-05-26 16:35 ` Justin P. Mattock 2010-05-26 16:35 ` Justin P. Mattock 2010-05-26 16:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2010-05-26 16:40 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2010-05-26 16:51 ` Justin P. Mattock 2010-05-26 16:51 ` Justin P. Mattock
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.