All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@cesarb.net>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make kunmap_atomic() harder to misuse
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 07:45:03 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C03932F.8000303@cesarb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005311945.19784.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Em 31-05-2010 07:15, Rusty Russell escreveu:
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 01:12:56 pm Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 May 2010 07:53:13 -0300 Cesar Eduardo Barros<cesarb@cesarb.net>  wrote:
>>> +/* Prevent people trying to call kunmap_atomic() as if it were kunmap() */
>>> +struct __kunmap_atomic_dummy {};
>>> +#define kunmap_atomic(addr, idx) do { \
>>> +		BUILD_BUG_ON( \
>>> +			__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(addr), struct page *)&&  \
>>> +			!__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(addr), struct __kunmap_atomic_dummy *)); \
>>> +		kunmap_atomic_notypecheck((addr), (idx)); \
>>> +	} while (0)
>>
>> We have a little __same_type() helper for this.  __must_be_array()
>> should be using it, too.
>
> Yep... but I think BUILD_BUG_ON(__same_type((addr), struct page *)); is
> sufficient; void * is not compatible in my quick tests here.

That is what I get for only reading the manual instead of testing :(

(I only tested the completed patch, not each step along the way.)

I will try it later today and make a new patch if it works as expected.

-- 
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@cesarb.net
cesar.barros@gmail.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@cesarb.net>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make kunmap_atomic() harder to misuse
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 07:45:03 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C03932F.8000303@cesarb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005311945.19784.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Em 31-05-2010 07:15, Rusty Russell escreveu:
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 01:12:56 pm Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 May 2010 07:53:13 -0300 Cesar Eduardo Barros<cesarb@cesarb.net>  wrote:
>>> +/* Prevent people trying to call kunmap_atomic() as if it were kunmap() */
>>> +struct __kunmap_atomic_dummy {};
>>> +#define kunmap_atomic(addr, idx) do { \
>>> +		BUILD_BUG_ON( \
>>> +			__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(addr), struct page *)&&  \
>>> +			!__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(addr), struct __kunmap_atomic_dummy *)); \
>>> +		kunmap_atomic_notypecheck((addr), (idx)); \
>>> +	} while (0)
>>
>> We have a little __same_type() helper for this.  __must_be_array()
>> should be using it, too.
>
> Yep... but I think BUILD_BUG_ON(__same_type((addr), struct page *)); is
> sufficient; void * is not compatible in my quick tests here.

That is what I get for only reading the manual instead of testing :(

(I only tested the completed patch, not each step along the way.)

I will try it later today and make a new patch if it works as expected.

-- 
Cesar Eduardo Barros
cesarb@cesarb.net
cesar.barros@gmail.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-31 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-28 10:53 [PATCH] Make kunmap_atomic() harder to misuse Cesar Eduardo Barros
2010-05-28 10:53 ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2010-05-30  3:42 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-30  3:42   ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-30 17:42   ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2010-05-30 17:42     ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2010-05-31 10:15   ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 10:15     ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 10:45     ` Cesar Eduardo Barros [this message]
2010-05-31 10:45       ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2010-05-31 23:45       ` [PATCH v2] " Cesar Eduardo Barros
2010-05-31 23:45         ` Cesar Eduardo Barros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C03932F.8000303@cesarb.net \
    --to=cesarb@cesarb.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.