From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for June 8
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:43:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C10B3AF.5000201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C0FBFDF.5050009@codemonkey.ws>
Am 09.06.2010 18:22, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 06/09/2010 10:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> However, libvirt was counting on this feature and on the snapshot commands
>>> to switch from the text Monitor. We have two options:
>>>
>>> 1. Ask them to wait one more release (not so good for us)
>>> 2. Try to find a way to have those features in for 0.13
>>>
>>> Daniel has commented to me that making the snapshot commands synchronous
>>> for 0.13 wouldn't be that bad, what do you think?
>>>
>> The thought is that changing a command from synchronous to asynchronous is
>> not an ABI incompatible change. An existing app simply won't know to take
>> advantage of the new possibilities that async commands offer.
>>
>
> It's not QMP that's the major issue with savevm. The major issue is
> actually the way snapshots are saved in qcow2. You need to know the
> size of the snapshot prior to creating the snapshot
Huh, why this? Seems I still haven't understood all of qcow2 then... I
always thought that there's just a specific offset where VM state
starts, but no explicit end.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for June 8
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:43:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C10B3AF.5000201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C0FBFDF.5050009@codemonkey.ws>
Am 09.06.2010 18:22, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 06/09/2010 10:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> However, libvirt was counting on this feature and on the snapshot commands
>>> to switch from the text Monitor. We have two options:
>>>
>>> 1. Ask them to wait one more release (not so good for us)
>>> 2. Try to find a way to have those features in for 0.13
>>>
>>> Daniel has commented to me that making the snapshot commands synchronous
>>> for 0.13 wouldn't be that bad, what do you think?
>>>
>> The thought is that changing a command from synchronous to asynchronous is
>> not an ABI incompatible change. An existing app simply won't know to take
>> advantage of the new possibilities that async commands offer.
>>
>
> It's not QMP that's the major issue with savevm. The major issue is
> actually the way snapshots are saved in qcow2. You need to know the
> size of the snapshot prior to creating the snapshot
Huh, why this? Seems I still haven't understood all of qcow2 then... I
always thought that there's just a specific offset where VM state
starts, but no explicit end.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-10 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-08 15:05 KVM call minutes for June 8 Chris Wright
2010-06-08 15:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Chris Wright
2010-06-08 16:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-08 16:01 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2010-06-08 20:59 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-06-08 21:13 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-09 15:18 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-06-09 15:31 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-06-09 15:31 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-06-09 16:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-09 16:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-09 16:29 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-06-09 16:29 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-06-10 9:43 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2010-06-10 9:43 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-06-10 12:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-10 12:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-10 13:08 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-06-10 13:08 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-06-10 14:11 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-10 14:11 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-10 14:22 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-06-10 14:22 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-06-10 14:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-10 14:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-11 12:55 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-06-11 12:55 ` Luiz Capitulino
2010-06-11 13:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-11 13:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-09 16:26 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C10B3AF.5000201@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.