From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] fix smp with tcg mode and --enable-io-thread
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:06:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C206F1B.6080008@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100621230607.GA19203@amt.cnet>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3376 bytes --]
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:58:32PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>>> Clear exit_request when iothread grabs the global lock.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
>>>> index 026980a..74cb973 100644
>>>> --- a/cpu-exec.c
>>>> +++ b/cpu-exec.c
>>>> @@ -236,10 +236,8 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUState *env1)
>>>> asm("");
>>>> env = env1;
>>>>
>>>> - if (exit_request) {
>>>> + if (exit_request)
>>>> env->exit_request = 1;
>>>> - exit_request = 0;
>>>> - }
>>> Coding style...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> #if defined(TARGET_I386)
>>>> if (!kvm_enabled()) {
>>>> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
>>>> index fcd0f09..ef1ab22 100644
>>>> --- a/cpus.c
>>>> +++ b/cpus.c
>>>> @@ -598,6 +598,7 @@ void qemu_mutex_lock_iothread(void)
>>>> }
>>>> qemu_mutex_unlock(&qemu_fair_mutex);
>>>> }
>>>> + exit_request = 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> void qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(void)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I looked into this a bit as well, and that's what I also have in my
>>> queue.
>>>
>>> But things are still widely broken: pause_all_vcpus and run_on_cpu as
>>> there is no guarantee that all VCPUs regularly call into
>>> qemu_wait_io_event. Also breakpoints don't work, not only in SMP mode.
>
> This fixes pause for me:
>
Partially. It caused regressions on the SMP scheduling without the early
loop exit in my patch. I will break up my changes later today and post
them as series.
>
> diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
> index c776605..0149da5 100644
> --- a/cpu-exec.c
> +++ b/cpu-exec.c
> @@ -238,7 +238,6 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUState *env1)
>
> if (exit_request) {
> env->exit_request = 1;
> - exit_request = 0;
> }
>
> #if defined(TARGET_I386)
> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
> index 826886c..14f7cfc 100644
> --- a/cpus.c
> +++ b/cpus.c
> @@ -403,6 +403,8 @@ static void qemu_wait_io_event_common(CPUState *env)
>
> static void qemu_wait_io_event(CPUState *env)
> {
> + CPUState *e;
> +
> while (!tcg_has_work())
> qemu_cond_timedwait(env->halt_cond, &qemu_global_mutex, 1000);
>
> @@ -417,7 +419,9 @@ static void qemu_wait_io_event(CPUState *env)
> qemu_mutex_unlock(&qemu_fair_mutex);
>
> qemu_mutex_lock(&qemu_global_mutex);
> - qemu_wait_io_event_common(env);
> +
> + for (e = first_cpu; e != NULL; e = e->next_cpu)
> + qemu_wait_io_event_common(e);
> }
>
> static void qemu_kvm_eat_signal(CPUState *env, int timeout)
> @@ -614,6 +618,7 @@ void qemu_mutex_lock_iothread(void)
> }
> qemu_mutex_unlock(&qemu_fair_mutex);
> }
> + exit_request = 0;
> }
>
> void qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(void)
>
>
>
> Perhaps there is a similar problem with debugging (round robin
> in tcg_cpu_exec fails when there is a timer pending, and the
> iothread is not processing pending timers).
>
Frankly, I still can't explain the round-robin logic. What complicates
the situation is that it currently has to work in both threading modes.
I really think we need a proper time-slicing model, maybe with early
yield if the guest runs on some pause instruction, ie. spins on a lock.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-22 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-18 16:37 [Qemu-devel] smp broken in tcg mode with --enable-io-thread? Jan Kiszka
2010-06-18 19:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-21 19:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix smp with tcg mode and --enable-io-thread Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-21 20:25 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-06-21 20:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-21 23:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-22 8:06 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-06-23 7:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-23 16:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-06-21 22:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-06-21 22:25 ` Alexander Graf
2010-06-22 7:59 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C206F1B.6080008@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.