* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22
@ 2010-06-22 13:23 ` Alexander Graf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Graf @ 2010-06-22 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Williamson; +Cc: Chris Wright, qemu-devel, kvm, Juan Quintela
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:49 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> On 06/22/2010 07:04 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>>> Chris Wright<chrisw@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>
>>>> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> As we have no agenda. This week call gets cancelled.
>>>
>>>
>> Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?
>>
>> The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at
>> 7:04am CST. That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people
>> in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)
>>
>
> Indeed, open at midnight, closed at 6am here. If anyone is still
> interested, I'd like to talk about canonical device paths
> (vmstate/ramblock naming).
>
In fact, the only times the call was canceled right after it started was
when Anthony was on vacation. I think the canceling rule doesn't make
sense when he's around.
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22
2010-06-22 13:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf
@ 2010-06-22 13:33 ` Jes Sorensen
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2010-06-22 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Graf
Cc: Alex Williamson, Chris Wright, qemu-devel, kvm, Juan Quintela
On 06/22/10 15:23, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?
>>>
>>> The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at
>>> 7:04am CST. That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people
>>> in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)
>>>
>>
>> Indeed, open at midnight, closed at 6am here. If anyone is still
>> interested, I'd like to talk about canonical device paths
>> (vmstate/ramblock naming).
>>
>
> In fact, the only times the call was canceled right after it started was
> when Anthony was on vacation. I think the canceling rule doesn't make
> sense when he's around.
It sounds like we should have the call and modify Chris' crontab to send
out the note 18 hours earlier :)
Cheers,
Jes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22
@ 2010-06-22 13:33 ` Jes Sorensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2010-06-22 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Graf
Cc: Chris Wright, Alex Williamson, qemu-devel, kvm, Juan Quintela
On 06/22/10 15:23, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?
>>>
>>> The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at
>>> 7:04am CST. That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people
>>> in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)
>>>
>>
>> Indeed, open at midnight, closed at 6am here. If anyone is still
>> interested, I'd like to talk about canonical device paths
>> (vmstate/ramblock naming).
>>
>
> In fact, the only times the call was canceled right after it started was
> when Anthony was on vacation. I think the canceling rule doesn't make
> sense when he's around.
It sounds like we should have the call and modify Chris' crontab to send
out the note 18 hours earlier :)
Cheers,
Jes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM call agenda for June 22
2010-06-22 13:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf
@ 2010-06-22 14:10 ` Juan Quintela
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Juan Quintela @ 2010-06-22 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Graf
Cc: Alex Williamson, Anthony Liguori, Chris Wright, kvm, qemu-devel
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
> Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:49 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/22/2010 07:04 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>
>>>> Chris Wright<chrisw@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> As we have no agenda. This week call gets cancelled.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?
>>>
>>> The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at
>>> 7:04am CST. That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people
>>> in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)
>>>
>>
>> Indeed, open at midnight, closed at 6am here. If anyone is still
>> interested, I'd like to talk about canonical device paths
>> (vmstate/ramblock naming).
>>
>
> In fact, the only times the call was canceled right after it started was
> when Anthony was on vacation. I think the canceling rule doesn't make
> sense when he's around.
Oops. I was asked to run meeting or cancel it if nobody sent anything to
the agenda. I didn't look at the time that the agenda was sent, sorry.
And I think we canceled the meeting 2-3 weeks ago, no?
Later, Juan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22
@ 2010-06-22 14:10 ` Juan Quintela
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Juan Quintela @ 2010-06-22 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Graf; +Cc: Chris Wright, Alex Williamson, kvm, qemu-devel
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
> Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:49 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/22/2010 07:04 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>
>>>> Chris Wright<chrisw@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> As we have no agenda. This week call gets cancelled.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?
>>>
>>> The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at
>>> 7:04am CST. That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people
>>> in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)
>>>
>>
>> Indeed, open at midnight, closed at 6am here. If anyone is still
>> interested, I'd like to talk about canonical device paths
>> (vmstate/ramblock naming).
>>
>
> In fact, the only times the call was canceled right after it started was
> when Anthony was on vacation. I think the canceling rule doesn't make
> sense when he's around.
Oops. I was asked to run meeting or cancel it if nobody sent anything to
the agenda. I didn't look at the time that the agenda was sent, sorry.
And I think we canceled the meeting 2-3 weeks ago, no?
Later, Juan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM call agenda for June 22
2010-06-22 14:10 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
@ 2010-06-22 14:40 ` Anthony Liguori
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-06-22 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juan Quintela
Cc: Alexander Graf, Alex Williamson, Chris Wright, kvm, qemu-devel
On 06/22/2010 09:10 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Alexander Graf<agraf@suse.de> wrote:
>
>> Alex Williamson wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:49 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 06/22/2010 07:04 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Chris Wright<chrisw@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> As we have no agenda. This week call gets cancelled.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?
>>>>
>>>> The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at
>>>> 7:04am CST. That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people
>>>> in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Indeed, open at midnight, closed at 6am here. If anyone is still
>>> interested, I'd like to talk about canonical device paths
>>> (vmstate/ramblock naming).
>>>
>>>
>> In fact, the only times the call was canceled right after it started was
>> when Anthony was on vacation. I think the canceling rule doesn't make
>> sense when he's around.
>>
> Oops. I was asked to run meeting or cancel it if nobody sent anything to
> the agenda. I didn't look at the time that the agenda was sent, sorry.
>
> And I think we canceled the meeting 2-3 weeks ago, no?
>
I think for the past month or so, whether the meeting gets cancelled is
based on a race condition between me finishing my first cup of coffee
and you sending out the cancellation note ;-)
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Later, Juan.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22
@ 2010-06-22 14:40 ` Anthony Liguori
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2010-06-22 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juan Quintela
Cc: Chris Wright, Alex Williamson, Alexander Graf, kvm, qemu-devel
On 06/22/2010 09:10 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Alexander Graf<agraf@suse.de> wrote:
>
>> Alex Williamson wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 07:49 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 06/22/2010 07:04 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Chris Wright<chrisw@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we have a lack of agenda items I'll cancel the week's call.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> As we have no agenda. This week call gets cancelled.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Could we send the agenda note out a little bit earlier?
>>>>
>>>> The note arrived at 12:55am CST and we decided we had no agenda at
>>>> 7:04am CST. That's a pretty short window and I imagine a lot of people
>>>> in the US are not actually awake during that period of time :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Indeed, open at midnight, closed at 6am here. If anyone is still
>>> interested, I'd like to talk about canonical device paths
>>> (vmstate/ramblock naming).
>>>
>>>
>> In fact, the only times the call was canceled right after it started was
>> when Anthony was on vacation. I think the canceling rule doesn't make
>> sense when he's around.
>>
> Oops. I was asked to run meeting or cancel it if nobody sent anything to
> the agenda. I didn't look at the time that the agenda was sent, sorry.
>
> And I think we canceled the meeting 2-3 weeks ago, no?
>
I think for the past month or so, whether the meeting gets cancelled is
based on a race condition between me finishing my first cup of coffee
and you sending out the cancellation note ;-)
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Later, Juan.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: KVM call agenda for June 22
2010-06-22 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
@ 2010-06-22 14:52 ` Juan Quintela
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Juan Quintela @ 2010-06-22 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anthony Liguori
Cc: Alexander Graf, Alex Williamson, Chris Wright, kvm, qemu-devel
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> On 06/22/2010 09:10 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> I think for the past month or so, whether the meeting gets cancelled
> is based on a race condition between me finishing my first cup of
> coffee and you sending out the cancellation note ;-)
This is my 1st cancellation note, so ...
But from there on, I will talk with Chris about sending it on his Sunday
night or my Monday morning (i.e. 24h before the decission to cancel (or
not)) the call.
Sorry for the inconvenience, Juan.
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>> Later, Juan.
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for June 22
@ 2010-06-22 14:52 ` Juan Quintela
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Juan Quintela @ 2010-06-22 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anthony Liguori
Cc: Chris Wright, Alex Williamson, Alexander Graf, kvm, qemu-devel
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
> On 06/22/2010 09:10 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> I think for the past month or so, whether the meeting gets cancelled
> is based on a race condition between me finishing my first cup of
> coffee and you sending out the cancellation note ;-)
This is my 1st cancellation note, so ...
But from there on, I will talk with Chris about sending it on his Sunday
night or my Monday morning (i.e. 24h before the decission to cancel (or
not)) the call.
Sorry for the inconvenience, Juan.
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>> Later, Juan.
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread