Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai and Gumstix Overo

[Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>]

Fredrik Asplund wrote:
>> Xenomai 2.5.3 was tested on OMAP3 with the mainline kernel. If you 
>> absolutely want to use this vendor branch, you will have to fix the
>>  patch rejects by hand.
> 
> Ok, yes, I thought so. I guess I was hoping someone had done the same
> thing and had some pointers on what to do in this specific case (i.e.
> applying Xenomai using Bitbake on a vendor branch).
> 
> I will try to apply the patch rejects (I want to deviate from the
> original setup as little as possible, at least to begin with)

If you do not want to deviate from Xenomai usual setup, use the mainline
kernel. If I were you, I would have serious doubts on a vendor kernel
which touches generic files such as include/asm/cacheflush.h in order to
add some board-specific code.

, but
> when I went through the source folder I couldn´t find any "*.rej"
> files (even though the log suggests they were created). Do I need to
> call the prepare-kernel.sh script differently somehow or is the
> problem in my tool environment?

The log is the result of running patch in "dry-run" mode, so that if it
fails, prepare-kernel.sh does not break your sources. Apply the adeos
patch by hand with the patch command. Once the sources are fixed,
prepare-kernel.sh will be able to detect that your kernel is already
patched and will skip that step.

> 
> / Fredrik


-- 
					    Gilles.