All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: hs@denx.de
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ata, pcmcia: problem with irq and ata_dev_read_id()
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 11:33:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C31A6DF.9080109@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C31A519.7030806@denx.de>

Hello,

On 07/05/2010 11:25 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> Yeah, that's the new polling code kicking in.  If the IRQ problem
>> doesn't persiste (which should be the case here), polling will step
>> down after a while and everything will return to normal.  If you keep
>> the system running more than ten minutes and use the CF device, does
>> the kernel complain anymore?
> 
> No, I can use the CF while kernel is in polling mode, also if the
> kernel switched back to irq mode:
> 
> Log, direct after kernel is up:
> 
..
>  25:          9   MPC8XX SIU       Level        pata_pcmcia
>  26:      10000   MPC8XX SIU       Level        pata_pcmcia
...
> 
> No irq is used.
> 
> -bash-3.2# dmesg
> [...]
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 132k init
> IRQ 26: spurious polling finished, reenabling IRQ
> -bash-3.2#
> 
> Now it is back in irq mode:
> 
> -bash-3.2# cat /proc/uptime
> 419.65 370.56
> -bash-3.2#
> 
...
>  25:          9   MPC8XX SIU       Level        pata_pcmcia
>  26:      10033   MPC8XX SIU       Level        pata_pcmcia

Cool, so it works as expected.  With the new lost/spurious IRQ
handling in place, removing TFLAG_POLLING from read_id for all
controllers shouldn't cause much problem.  However, the CF device is a
pretty rare corner case and spurious IRQ handling can deal with it
without too much problem, so leaving things as it is is probably
better.

Thanks for testing.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-05  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-31  5:57 ata, pcmcia: problem with irq and ata_dev_read_id() Heiko Schocher
2010-05-31 23:55 ` Robert Hancock
2010-06-28  5:31   ` Heiko Schocher
2010-07-02 15:01     ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-05  8:26       ` Heiko Schocher
2010-07-05  8:52         ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-05  9:25           ` Heiko Schocher
2010-07-05  9:33             ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-07-26 12:59               ` Heiko Schocher
2010-07-26 13:11                 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C31A6DF.9080109@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=hs@denx.de \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.