From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ata, pcmcia: problem with irq and ata_dev_read_id()
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:59:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4D86A4.2040500@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C31A6DF.9080109@gmail.com>
Hello Tejun,
Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 07/05/2010 11:25 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> Yeah, that's the new polling code kicking in. If the IRQ problem
>>> doesn't persiste (which should be the case here), polling will step
>>> down after a while and everything will return to normal. If you keep
>>> the system running more than ten minutes and use the CF device, does
>>> the kernel complain anymore?
>> No, I can use the CF while kernel is in polling mode, also if the
>> kernel switched back to irq mode:
>>
>> Log, direct after kernel is up:
>>
> ..
>> 25: 9 MPC8XX SIU Level pata_pcmcia
>> 26: 10000 MPC8XX SIU Level pata_pcmcia
> ...
>> No irq is used.
>>
>> -bash-3.2# dmesg
>> [...]
>> Freeing unused kernel memory: 132k init
>> IRQ 26: spurious polling finished, reenabling IRQ
>> -bash-3.2#
>>
>> Now it is back in irq mode:
>>
>> -bash-3.2# cat /proc/uptime
>> 419.65 370.56
>> -bash-3.2#
>>
> ...
>> 25: 9 MPC8XX SIU Level pata_pcmcia
>> 26: 10033 MPC8XX SIU Level pata_pcmcia
>
> Cool, so it works as expected. With the new lost/spurious IRQ
> handling in place, removing TFLAG_POLLING from read_id for all
> controllers shouldn't cause much problem. However, the CF device is a
> pretty rare corner case and spurious IRQ handling can deal with it
> without too much problem, so leaving things as it is is probably
> better.
Hmm.. I am not sure if "leaving things as it is" is the better way,
because this behaviour comes every time, I insert a card! And with
my patch I can prevent this behaviour ...
> Thanks for testing.
Thanks for your comments!
bye
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-26 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-31 5:57 ata, pcmcia: problem with irq and ata_dev_read_id() Heiko Schocher
2010-05-31 23:55 ` Robert Hancock
2010-06-28 5:31 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-07-02 15:01 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-05 8:26 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-07-05 8:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-05 9:25 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-07-05 9:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-26 12:59 ` Heiko Schocher [this message]
2010-07-26 13:11 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C4D86A4.2040500@denx.de \
--to=hs@denx.de \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.